Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

LINUX

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-14 19:38

What linux distro do you use?

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-16 19:47

>>39
Package security isn't a concern when you're on the BLEEDING EDGE.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-16 20:11

>>39
I am >>29 and I believe you have completely misrepresented my position. Please read it again and reconsider your reference to  my post.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-16 20:21

>>40
/opt is for programs that have bizarre and/or retarded hierarchies that, for whatever reason, can't be reshaped to fit a standard filesystem layout. It has nothing at all to do with $PATH, and Python, Ruby, Perl, etc. all have perfectly normal package hierarchies. Further, if you have multiple versions, you can install them all side by side in /usr without having to worry about collisions, because each version has its own subdirectory layout inside /usr/lib, /usr/include, /usr/share, etc. You'd just rename the binaries to /usr/bin/python2.5, /usr/bin/python2.6, etc. There is no practical reason whatsoever for installing them into /opt.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-17 13:40

>>42
Unless you referenced the wrong post by mistake, >>39's interpretation seems accurate.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-17 19:42

>>39,44
ONE WORD, DEBIAN OPENSSL PRNG, THREAD OVER

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-17 19:48

>>45
Only one serious flaw in over 9000 different packages? Terrible!

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-17 21:38

It affected over 9000 packages:

http://digitaloffense.net/tools/debian-openssl/

I still run Debian.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-17 22:23

>>45
I don't think you even know what a counterargument is.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-17 22:31

>>45-47
2008 called they have their bugfix ready for you.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-17 22:56

>>49
Read more than a few words next time.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-17 23:02

>>50
read it all the way to the bottom where it says this even Copyright © 2008 H D Moore <hdm[at]metasploit.com>

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-17 23:41

>>50
In other words: old news is quite old indeed.
You aren't subscribed to debian-security-announce?

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-18 5:53

>>52
SUBSCRIBE TO MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-18 21:16

>>5
* shitAfrican American

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-18 23:33

cum

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-18 23:43

http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/10/18/1312214/Desktop-Linux-Is-Dead

"It kills me to say this: The dream of Windows as a major desktop OS is now pretty much dead. Despite phenomenal security and stability — and amazing strides in usability, performance, and compatibility — Windows simply isn't catching on with desktop users. And if there ever was a chance for desktop Windows to succeed, that ship has long since sunk. ... Ultimately, Windows is doomed on the desktop because of a critical lack of content. And that lack of content owes its existence to two key factors: the fragmentation of the Windows platform, and the fierce ideology of the open-source community at large."

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-19 1:01

>>56
Trolls trolling trolls to score advertising to support yet more trolling.
PC World relevant? Since when? To whom? I don't know any one that reads it, and never met an IT manager that did either?
This vid while on a different topic is pretty much right on for this one to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hj7TtuZPxgw

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-19 9:01

>>56
People don't care about their freedom and care more about expedience and convenience. Big whoop.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-19 14:04

anus@codan:~$ cat .bashrc | grep Ubuntu
alias sudo="echo sudo: This is not Ubuntu, faggot. #"

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-19 16:43

>>59
See, this is how the Ubantu people check aliases.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-19 17:57

>>38
arch doesnt even include /usr/local/bin in its default PATH

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-19 18:43

>>61
That's fucking terrible man, I'm so sorry to hear this

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-19 19:49

>>60
You mean this is how Bash (not the Ubuntu learn to spell, ``faggot'') does not check aliases, because checking aliases would be fucking retarded.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-19 19:56

>>63
Make sure you understand the discussion before you try to participate.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-19 19:57

>>64
lolitrolu

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-19 20:09

>>61
And Arch's official policy for installing unmanaged packages is "don't", because it's dead fucking simple to make a package and install it so that it's tracked by the package manager. This is much unlike shit distros such as Debian where making a package is a painful and complicated procedure.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-19 20:24

>>61

export PATH="$PATH:/usr/local/bin"

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-19 22:47

>>67
Impressive point-missing you've got going on there, Captain Obvious.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-19 23:31

>>66
dpkg -b folder

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-20 0:11

>>69
Good luck getting to that point in less than five minutes, dickbrain.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-20 0:48

>>70
sudo checkinstall, faggot

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-20 4:01

src2pkg source.tar.gz

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-20 9:13

>>66
Yeah yeah, Arch has the benefit of standing on the shoulders of the giants, one which is Debian.

Name: ​​​​​​​​​​ 2010-10-25 19:00

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-31 20:27

<-- check em dubz
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -