lol i hate actionscript i am so trendy and cool hi my name is hotaru and i use .net
Name:
Anonymous2010-09-29 20:17
don't worry w3c is going to clear up all of your problems real soon
Name:
Anonymous2010-09-29 20:44
var foo = function(bar) {
alert("HAX MY " + bar);
};
foo("ANUS");
why do people define functions like that
Name:
Anonymous2010-09-29 20:49
>>11
In Scheme, this is called ``Indiana Style''. The aim is to show that there is nothing special about function definition, it's just a normal variable.
>>1
I wouldn't say that JavaScript sucks. It's got some good ideas at its core, but they're trapped in a language that was designed hastily and given poor implementations on web browsers for the first 8–10 years of its life.
Name:
Anonymous2010-09-29 23:05
>>15
Perhaps if ECMA gives it some real OO features, I mean classes, interfaces packages, overriding methods, etc, it will be able to make something of itself.
Name:
Anonymous2010-09-30 0:03
>>16
>it will be able to make something of itself
It has already made something of itself. It's pretty much required for non-flash sites but the implementation is always so messy that it sucks the elegance out of web design.
>>19
I read that once, and while I see his point, I disagree that they outweigh the bad parts sufficiently to make it underrated, much less the most underrated language in existence.