/prog/ - Object Oriented Programming

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 13:22

As a novice programmer and as someone who started learning programming with C, OOP just seems annoying to me. Seems as though it's easier to accomplish the same tasks without it. Is it actually necessary to learn it?

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 15:11

>>76
—
faggot

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 15:49

>>81
You must be one of those UNIX fans who thinks that using two or three hyphen-minuses is a good substitute for an em dash. It's not.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:03

>>82
Shut up, Rosio.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:19

>>83
I'm genuinely curious if you're a troll or really an idiot.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:23

>>82
I'm a Unix fan, and I hate TeX dashes. In an ASCII-only context I can put up with two dashes as a substitute for an em dash and one as a substitute for an en dash, but that's it. I don't know why you think this behavior is more common in Unix fans, or why you think >>81 is anything but a Windows user who blew in from the imageboards.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:23

>>83
Though I'm somewhat flattered you've mistaken me for Xarn, I am not him.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:24

>>84
What about his a troll?

Name: >>81 2010-10-02 16:35

>>85
Listen here, you flaming cockpustule. I read /prog/ off my /dev/tty3, and that symbol looks PIG DISGUSTING. Because of pieces of shit like you, I'll have to make my reader script replace it with ``--'' everywhere. Fuck you.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:43

>>88
It looks fine on my system. Maybe that's because I actually know how to configure it.
Stick to Ubanto, kid.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:51

>>89
Bullshit. There's no way you can make ttys to display ``—'' as two characters. And before you mention it, I am not going to use the fb driver.

Stick to Ubanto, kid.
Fuck you. I'm going to kill that fucking horse you're sitting so high upon.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:56

>>90
Yes there is. U+2014 → U+20 U+14 → " "

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:59

>>90
An em dash isn't supposed to be two characters wide. It's supposed to be the width of a letter M. Guess how wide that would be on a monospaced terminal.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 17:06

>>92
I don't care how it's supposed to look like, all I care about is for it to look the way I'm used for it to look like. And since most text I've read during my life used a disproportional font, I'm used to reading it as ``--'', i.e. two en dashes.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 17:09

>>93
So you're reading text in monospace that's meant to be read in a proportional font and whining that it doesn't look right?

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 17:32

>>93
You should stop calling other people faggots when you only have yourself to blame for your problems.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 17:37

>>94
meant to be read in a proportional font
Where does it say that?

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 17:41

This discussion is almost as stupid as these ``What's your favorite[sic] <anything> and why.''.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 17:52

This thread has been threadstopped and replaced with the following topic:

1 Name: Anonymous : 2010-10-02 13:53

What's your favourite dash, and why?

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 17:56

/bin/dash

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 18:03

/usr/bin/dash

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 18:08

/usr/local/bin/dash

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 18:11

/home/sussman/src/dash/src/dash

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 18:39

./dash

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 19:27

C:\dash.exe

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 23:50

DASH MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 10:57

>>64
Which language has a good OOP system?

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 11:04

>>106
Io

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 11:43

>>106
BASIC

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 11:47

>>106
http://exp777.cs.land.to/dexgen/?p=Lamda+Calculus&l=en

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 11:52

>>109
No, Trainers, you are the Lambda Calculus.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 12:08

hello

http://twitter.com/zombieferox
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1712588/

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 17:31

>>107
Io's object system is great until you get to the part where you must reprogram the environment via introspection methods for certain tasks. It's still better than many others, and what else can you do with a prototype system?

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 17:49

I agree with >>33 and add that passion and fanboyism give rise to low-quality software. Use whatever fits best, and mix different paradigms in the same project if you need.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 4:49

<

Object Oriented Programming

1 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 13:22

81 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 15:11

82 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 15:49

83 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:03

84 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:19

85 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:23

86 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:23

87 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:24

88 Name: >>81 2010-10-02 16:35

89 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:43

90 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:51

91 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:56

92 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:59

93 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 17:06

94 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 17:09

95 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 17:32

96 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 17:37

97 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 17:41

98 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 17:52

99 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 17:56

100 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 18:03

101 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 18:08

102 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 18:11

103 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 18:39

104 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 19:27

105 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 23:50

106 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 10:57

107 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 11:04

108 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 11:43

109 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 11:47

110 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 11:52

111 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 12:08

112 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 17:31

113 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 17:49

115 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 4:49

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 13:22

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 15:11

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 15:49

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:03

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:19

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:23

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:23

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:24

Name: >>81 2010-10-02 16:35

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:43

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:51

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:56

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 16:59

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 17:06

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 17:09

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 17:32

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 17:37

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 17:41

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 17:52

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 17:56

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 18:03

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 18:08

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 18:11

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 18:39

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 19:27

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-02 23:50

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 10:57

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 11:04

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 11:43

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 11:47

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 11:52

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 12:08

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 17:31

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-03 17:49

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 4:49