It's the end of the /prog/ as we know it
1
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-18 2:29
That's great it starts with a thread bump
2
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-18 3:51
huffman trees of course they still do.
3
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-18 11:59
>>2
I huffman tree everyday
4
Name:
Anonymous 2010-09-18 12:48
>>2
people still use FORTRAN, people still use COBOL, people still write their own sorting algorithms, people still use MySQL ...
5
Name:
Anonymous 2010-09-18 13:28
people still use MySQL everything else.
6
Name:
Anonymous 2010-09-18 13:47
Huffman trees are still better than most of the things people try to use in their stead, and not enough people understand how they work.
7
Name:
2
2010-09-19 3:11
>>4,6
You are correct, and have opened my eyes. I am sorry for my impertinence. I offer my anus to you.
8
Name:
Anonymous 2010-09-19 5:30
>>5
It's probably good enough for what they use it for. Hell, it was even good enough for Facebook for a while.
9
Name:
Anonymous 2010-09-19 6:20
>>8
back to the social network , please
10
Name:
Anonymous 2010-09-19 8:58
>>8
Oh yeah, and Facebook is the epitome of excellent design and worth. May I remind you of their PHP->C++ compiler?
11
Name:
Anonymous 2010-09-19 9:38
>>10
PHP->C++ compiler
I just puked in my mouth a little.
12
Name:
VIPPER 2010-09-19 9:38
>>10
PHP->C++ compiler
@_@
ENTER THE JEWS
13
Name:
Anonymous 2010-09-19 9:45
14
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-19 9:46
what does the author mean in the last line, ``i of a for loop, listen to yourself poop"
15
Name:
Anonymous 2010-09-19 10:10
>>14
I don't know.
I hope you've found this reply helpful.
16
Name:
Anonymous 2010-09-19 11:51
17
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-19 14:58
18
Name:
Anonymous 2010-09-19 15:03
19
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-19 16:00
∧＿∧ ／￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣
20
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-19 16:15
>>5
In the spirit of success, I choose DBase
21
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-20 14:26
>>14
It's just a parody of R.E.M. -
66 It's The End of the World as we Know It (And I Feel Fine),
99 it (like the original song) doesn't mean anything.
22
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-20 17:07
>>18
That inspired me. I was thinking about
*.rand, however...
> *.rand.WHAT
lookofdisapproval
23
Name:
Anonymous 2010-09-20 18:16
>>22
Whatever is weird. I had the same idea, but you need to do something like:
<1 2 3 4 5>[*.rand];
*.rand is evaluated in place and used as an array subscript so this is roughly the same as
.pick(), not
.pick(*). In both cases Whatever becomes the array length, but pick uses it as an item count and rand uses it as a maximum float value.
25
Name:
Anonymous 2010-12-25 9:42