Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

C++ question

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-16 20:39

Hey prog!! I am learning C++ and I was wondering how I could extend its syntax. Any C++ experts there want to tell me how? I know C++ is really low level so it should be simple. Thanks!!!

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-18 15:47

>>40
So is operator overloading. So are templates. And yet... C++.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-18 15:54

>>40
You're just showing your ignorance.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-18 16:07

>>42
You're just showing your ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-18 16:47

>>40
Extending syntax isn't as basic as opening windows.
It is in certain *cough* paren-based languages and a few others
It's entirely unnecessary in a Turing-complete language.
If that is your argument then we can do away with everything except lambda as Alonzo Church and others have shown. The reason languages include certain features is that they make it more useful and make programs easier to write, not because they are essential to attaining Turing Completeness.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-18 17:09

paren-based
Stop that.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-18 17:43

>>45
He mena ``monad-based''.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-18 19:02

>>46
God, I hope not.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-18 21:54

>>47
Agreed. Arrows are THE FUTURE!!!

Actually, I have no idea what they are.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-19 2:43

>>46
My C++ compiler doesn't include any information about "monads." :(

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-19 13:42

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-19 16:38

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-19 17:20

machine language is the synonym for turing-completeness yet use use memonics and macro assemblers why do you think that is?

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-19 17:33

>>52
You're making slightly less sense than that markov bot.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 14:51

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-17 20:09

that's cool and all, but check 'em

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List