Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Oracle Sues Google

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-19 13:53

So it has been a few days since the news hit the tubes. What's your opinion, /proggit/?

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-20 13:44

What do databases have to do with phones?

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-20 14:07

>>41
Search.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-20 14:19

>>40
Technically, Google made the same mistake Microsoft did when it got sued by Sun.
Well, no. Microsoft actually had a contract with Sun to ship a standard JVM with Windows/IE, and they were in violation of that contract by making their "Microsoft Java Runtime" incompatible with Sun's Java (embrace, extend, extinguish).

Google has no contract with Sun/Oracle. The only connection to Oracle (besides patents) is that they use the Java name and the Java compiler as an intermediary. The Java compiler is open source though, so they are legally within their rights to use it.

This is a patent infringement case, nothing more.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-20 16:43

>>39
PROTIP: Your post has nothing to do with the post you replied to.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-20 16:57

>>27
Speak for yourself

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-20 19:51

Anyways, >>1, please listen to me. That it's really related to this thread.
Yesterday I found some of my father's old magazines. There was a 1986 computer magazine. Talked about a newfangled printer that cost as much as car. Ads for computers displayed the price for bundles with monochrome displays in large type, with the price for the color display in small type.
Some editorial lamented that software was not patentable in my country. The author was earnestly thinking that computing would never outgrow the professional and hobby markets to become ubiquitous unless we urgently enacted some patent reform.
Reminded me that every belief we hold as self-evident about IT today will be laughable in 25 years.
What this all really means, though, is that actually I'm not sure what it means, I just felt like sharing my cool story!

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-20 21:48

>>46
There's a fundamental flaw in your post.

Your story isn't cool.

Have a nice day.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-20 22:07

>>47
Hey bro, don't be hatin' on >>46. I think his story is cool enough to be posted; much cooler than your post, that's for sure.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-20 22:13

>>46
I enjoyed this story.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-21 14:11

Good story, >>46.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-21 15:36

>>48-50
Hello, >>46.

Name: >>48 2010-08-21 16:00

>>51
Dunno about >>49,50, but I'm not >>46. You jelly?

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-21 17:13

>>52
I thought so, but I also thought it'd be more of a statement if I encompassed more than two posts. I'm sorry if I caused offence.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-21 19:04

>>51
I only jisaku jien when it is not obvious. Here, it is blatant. Ergo, it was not me.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 14:49

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 18:41


Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List