R6RS Implementations and Licensing

Why are there no good, free, and non-GPL R6RS Scheme implementations? How the fuck am I supposed to embed this into my applications when I'm forced to fucking release the source code to the rest of my software under GPL. No wonder it doesn't have a lot of community adoption outside of academia and the open-sores community.

>>40
no, the GPL is pretty clear about how derivative works need to be licenced. You are probably thinking of the LGPL

>>40
If your software combines directly with the GPL software (i.e. it is statically linked and possibly even dynamically linked together) then the derived software program is subject to the terms of the GPL. When you wish to distribute GPL software, then you must follow the licensing terms.

>>42
Dynamic linking counts. Runtime loading has a few outs though.

>>39
How ironic.
It's like meeting the woman of your dreams... and then finding out she's a C++ programmer.

>>39,44
http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1925705

Are you GAY?
Are you a NIGGER?
Are you a GAY NIGGER?

If you answered "Yes" to all of the above questions, then GNAA (GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) might be exactly what you've been looking for!