Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

rate your language

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-28 5:39

Scalability:x/10;
Performance:x/10;
Ease of use:x/10;
verbosity:x/10;

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 19:04

>>72
Infix appears natural and simple because that's what you've been thought in school. What is simpler (+ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9) or 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9?

As for 3*x**2 + 4*x + y + 4, (+ (* 3 x x) (* x 4) y 4) is pretty readable to me. It's only confusing the first few days/week of looking at it. It becomes as natural as infix after you've used it for a week or so, moreso if you use a structured editing package like Paredit.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List