>>13
>>This was a bit slow
Actually, it was faster than all other Lisp implementations at the time. Only when even faster generalized CPUs came out that Lisp could run at a comparable speed (and still not quite as fast for a short while.
And if GC was directly implemented in hardware. I salivate at the though.
>>12
It's not the whole packaged without the (near)Lisp-native cpu. Plus, I've heard the emulator for that is pretty dodgy.