Exercise 9.

Give your view as to why a course in assembly language is no
longer a requirement for a computer science degree in many colleges.

>>34
>>33 is right, you are undermining your own point. Your claim is that a given assembly language can be realised in Hardware in a multitude of ways. No-one disputes that, but it brings us back to the original point, that knowledge of the interface does not give you knowledge of the internals ,or to put it bluntly, HOW IT WORKS. Which is fine, you can do useful things with that knowledge, but you can't claim you understand the hardware. A computer architecture class is more than an assembly tutorial