Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

SexpCode+ revision

Name:   2010-06-27 17:48

Each character should refer to a single-character atom rather than having these dot things to differentiate between each single-character atom.

NO EXCEPTIONS
[b][i][o][u]NO EXCEPTIONS[/u][/o][/i][/b]
{b.i.o.u NO EXCEPTIONS}
becomes
{biou NO EXCEPTIONS}

But, in the case of a multi-char atom like tt, spoiler, sub, sup, quote, or img, we should make use of the dot things.

A dot should be used to denote the start of a multi-character atom and optionally the end of the atom, e.g.

fioc user
[sub]fioc user[/sub]
{sub fioc user}
becomes
{.sub fioc user}

and

/b/
[i][sup][b]/b/[/b][/sup][/i]
{i.sup.b /b/}
becomes
{i.sup.b /b/}

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-28 18:03

>>53
I think you mean {.define }, because define is a multi-character atom.

You can only define a single function at a time.

{.define bi #}
.bi is #

{.define o i}
o is i

{.define bio m}
.bio is m

{.define u rem}
u is r.e.m

{.define biou aa}
.biou is a.a

{.biou what happens now, asshole?}
{a.a what happens now, asshole?}


You also probably meant {.define u .rem} and {.define biou .aa} also. Toodles!

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List