Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Has The Abelson repented?

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-13 14:29

Has the Anticudder seen the error in his ways?

http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2009/08/under-hood-of-app-inventor-for-android.html
>Under the Hood of App Inventor for Android
Tuesday, August 11, 2009 at 8/11/2009 08:00:00 AM

Posted by Bill Magnuson, Hal Abelson, and Mark Friedman

We recently announced our App Inventor for Android project on the Google Research Blog. That blog entry was long on vision but short on technological details--details which we think would be of interest to our readers.

Of particular interest is our use of Scheme. Part of our development environment is a visual programming language similar to Scratch. The visual language provides a drag-and-drop interface for assembling procedures and event handlers that manipulate high-level components of Android-based phones. The components are similar to the ones in the recently announced Simple; in fact, the code bases share an ancestor.

We parse the visual programming language into an S-expression intermediate language, which is a domain-specific language expressed as a set of Scheme macros, along with a Scheme runtime library. We did this for a few reasons: (...)

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-13 15:24

There is no significance. There is only Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-13 16:50

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-13 16:58

Lain

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-13 18:28

and you don't seem to understand...

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-13 18:52

Scratch amuses me to no end.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-14 0:12

>>6
Angling for a SCRATCH MY ANUS, I see.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-14 0:23

>>7
ANGLE MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-14 4:30

Abelson is an engineer. Talking about him ``defecting'' and portraying him like he was some kind of fundamentalist is unscientific and ultimately destructive.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 3:46

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 14:07

<-- check 'em

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 7:56

He has not reprentendenefensendefndenef3dfrfs gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick gimme that fat dick

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-19 14:38

/prog/ will be spammed continuously until further notice. we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-31 8:03


Zero is an additive identity κ + 0 = 0 + κ = κ.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-31 8:48


\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \, f(t)\ dt \ = \infty means that the area under f(t) is infinite.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-31 9:33


The modern study of set theory was initiated by Georg Cantor and Richard Dedekind in the 1870s. After the discovery of paradoxes in naive set theory, numerous axiom systems were proposed in the early twentieth century, of which the Zermelo–Fraenkel axioms, with the axiom of choice, are the best-known.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-31 10:20


In set theory as Cantor defined and Zermelo and Fraenkel axiomatized, an object is either a member of a set or not. In fuzzy set theory this condition was relaxed by Lotfi A. Zadeh so an object has a degree of membership in a set, a number between 0 and 1.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-31 11:05


Each choice function on a collection X of nonempty sets is an element of the Cartesian product of the sets in X. This is not the most general situation of a Cartesian product of a family of sets, where a same set can occur more than once as a factor; however, one can focus on elements of such a product that select the same element every time a given set appears as factor, and such elements correspond to an element of the Cartesian product of all distinct sets in the family
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -