I notice you smart CS types speak of toys. Toy compilers, toy languages. Is there some consensus as to what it means? At what point is something in programming *not* a toy?
>>35
If you can use a library in C, you can use it in asm.
It's just native code. I'm not saying you won't have to put some effort to get calling conventions right, set up stubs, whatever, but if you want it, you can use it.