Pascal vs C

If you were to give a language like Python static typing and make it a compiled language instead of interpreted, you basically end up with something like Pascal. So how would you rate Pascal's abilities compared to C? I know dynamic typing requires runtime checking, but would it be possible to have dynamic typing in a compiled language like Pascal?

>>37
I don't get why you have this irrational hate of runtime. They buy you some flexibility in exchange for a certain performance penalty, no big deal.

x86 also does not know what type system is.
> That would be why no assembly language type errors occur at runtime. You'd have a great point if they did.
Are you agreeing or disagreeing with him? If you don't have a type system then you can't get a type error, that should be obvious to even the retards on /prog/