>>17
I don't think one can do that to oneself.
Let's look at some definitions of the world:
Sexual assault is an assault of a sexual nature on another person.
Rape, also referred to as sexual assault, is an assault by a person involving sexual intercourse with or without sexual penetration of another person without that person's consent.
This means one cannot rape oneself by definition.
If we ignore the ``
another person'' requirement in the definition, let us examine the meaning of the remaining definition:
Rape, also referred to as sexual assault, is an assault by a person involving sexual intercourse with or without sexual penetration without that person's consent.
The lack of consent is another requirement. Since one has to premeditate the fact about what one is about to do to oneself, that implies giving consent to oneself, thus that part of the definition cannot apply, nor can the assualt part as it's consentual.
Thus the definition that remains is:
Rape is sexual intercourse with or without sexual penetration.
Oh wait, the definition of ``sexual intercourse'' says:
Sexual interaction, usually involving genital and/or anal and/or oral penetration, between at least two organisms
That doesn't work, as there is only one person involved in the act. If you remove that requirement, you end up with the definition of masturbation.
In simplest terms, you are implying
>>15 is fapping, which doesn't seem to me like much of an accusation, compared to his accusation calling
>>9 and
>>14 the same person, which seems much more likely.