Bazaar considered harmful

The documentation of Bazaar^[1] states that Bazaar is slower than Git, has fewer features than Git, takes up more space than Git, is not as well documented as Git, is only used by newbies, and so on. It even says they don't believe Bazaar could be more successful than other SCM systems.

Clearly the Bazaar documentation must have been written by someone who is forced to use Bazaar but secretly loves Git.

_____
^{[1] http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/migration/en/why-switch-to-bazaar.html}

>>23
Mercurial manages to do this without requiring users to type extra switches for the most common use of options. It's a pity writing an extension for git is so complex; they could really use the ability to move a lot of complexity into plugins.


$ hg help shelve