Wikipedia

Has anybody else noticed that the computer science pages on wikipedia are fan-fucking-tastic? I was reading the page on type systems, and about halfway through I realized that the article was far too technical to be so readable, and yet it was.

Is there a place I can thank the magnificent bastards who wrote this stuff?

>>1
I've had entirely the opposite experience.  I try to learn about something and there's a big article with diagrams but it doesn't make any sense because they just leave out a bunch of critical shit.  So I end up having to pirate a real book that covers it.

The math articles are even worse, because everything is described in terms of more advanced things it could be generalized into, instead of the behavior/uses of the thing itself.