Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Top 10 reasons not to donate

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-20 14:34

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-20 14:44

What a load of balls.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-20 14:53

mywikibiz
Top_10_Reasons_Not_to_Donate_to_Wikipedia
( ≖‿≖)

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-20 14:55

Perhaps you're philosophically opposed to any form of censorship and think this is a daft point. Can you be sure that your shareholders, your customers, and the members of your local school board feel the same way? Wikipedia contains graphic material that might be morally contemptible in many countries -- even in the West. This includes images and articles depicting nipple piercings, anilingus, labia piercings, child pornography erotica, various forms of piercing the penis, strappado bondage, erotic spanking, incest pornography, smotherboxes, and Courtney Cummz and her directorial debut 'Face Invaders'. (For more examples of Wikipedia trash, see Worst of Wikipedia.)



Nice.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-20 15:24

I agree with this.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-20 15:33

I disagree with this.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-20 15:38

>>6
I disagree with this.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-20 15:48

>>7
I disagree with this.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-20 16:44

There's only one reason not to donate to wikipedia: the guilt-trip-inducing message on the top of every fucking wikipedia page during donation drive.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-20 16:47

If you feel guilty about not helping Wikipedia, why don't you make a donation?

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-20 16:52

>>10
I don't feel guilty, but the fact that they try to guilt people into donating puts me off. I wish they would slap a bunch of adds around every article already and quit this nagging bullshit.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-20 16:54

*ads

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-20 17:10

>>11
But they would lose their impartiality!

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-20 17:15

>>13
Yeah, just like every fucking newspaper, right?

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-20 19:43

Please send a donation to aid the ongoing and badly needed disaster relief in Haiti. Or Tahiti, if you're dyslectic. Oh, and children in Uganda, I guess.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-20 19:48

vim

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-20 20:33

Wikipedia pollutes the minds of children.

Stopped reading there.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-20 20:58

>>17
Yeah, that's the only one I didn't agree with. They are *only* talking about nudity for educational purposes, which is a really silly 1950's viewpoint in my opinion. I bet these are the same people who pull their kids out of sex ed classes. It de-values the rest of the otherwise good article.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-20 21:23

You know, the great thing about Wikipedia is that "it's the encyclopedia anyone can edit." But unfortunately, the downside is, it's the encyclopedia anyone can edit.

(pause for laugher)

But seriously, computer science is a terrible name for...

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-20 21:27

>>19
That argument makes me so angry.
``I mean, it's written by people!  And you know how dumb people are!''

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-20 21:35

Wikipedia is about 32% less accurate than Encyclopedia Britannica.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-20 21:43

could easily operate on a budget of $1.6 million
Stopped reading there. Linking to a Yahoo Answers where the only source is yourself? He could learn a bit from WP:SOURCE.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-21 3:11

I consider most of his arguements weak.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-21 3:47

i'm not sure donating to wikipedia is notable

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-21 3:56

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-21 4:17

>>25
back to /b/ please

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-21 4:40

>>26
lolol is ur dof ded

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-21 4:51

someone mentioned anus haxing in moot's thread

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-21 5:20

We should have got him to confirm that there are only a dozen posters on /prog/

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-21 5:37

>>29
Then why has the frozen void script been installed 125 times?

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-21 6:02

>>25
Someone should have asked him what his opinions on /prog/ and LISP are.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-21 6:16

CORE2BUIO

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-21 6:43

FrOzEn2BUIO

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-21 6:59

>>30
2 reasons
1. Multiple Installations (Personally, I've done it twice on two computers)
2. No. of Posters != No. of Browsers

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-21 7:01

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-21 7:12

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-21 7:55

:help uganda

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-21 9:26

>>30
125 of those were you. And also him, trying to promote his script by giving an impression that it is being used.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-21 12:07

>>38
[citation needed]

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-21 12:35

>>18
It's a wiki just edit it out

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List