I feel retarded, /prog/

I'm on SICP, and I've never programmed before, and I'm stuck on the most basic of SICP exercises...

Exercise 1.3.  Define a procedure that takes three numbers as arguments and returns the sum of the squares of the two larger numbers.

Being the weakling that I am, I turned to google for help, and returned this program:

(define (square x) (* x x))
 
 (define (sum-of-squares x y)
   (+ (square x) (square y)))
 
 (define (largest-two-of-three x y z)
   (if (>= x y)
       (sum-of-squares x (if (>= y z) y z))
       (sum-of-squares y (if (>= x z) x z))))

It's the largest part I'm having problems with:
It defines the function "largest-two-of-three" with variables 'x', 'y' and 'z'. It goes on to state the parameters of the function as, if x is greater than y, do the sum of squares for x and, if y is greater than or equal to z, y and z, and if y isn't larger or equal to z, then z? Or, if x is less than y, do the sum of squares for y and, if x is greater than or equal to z, x, if not, z?

I know this is a really sad place to be stuck on, but I want to learn how to program rather much, and I won't let this stop me

>>21
Why does it irritate you? The standard requires that <= be monotonically non-decreasing or at least r5rs did i.e. (<= 1 2 3 4 ...) is the same as 1 <= 2 <= 3 <= 4 <= ...
I don't think it would be better if it acted like
(define (<=* first . rest)
    (any (λ (x) (<= first x)) rest))