Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Do all gui toolkits suck?

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-05 7:06

After messing around with wxwidgets, qt, and gtk+, I'm under this impression. Do they all suck or am I just not reading the docs correctly

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-06 23:17

>>39
Pile on some misery and you get a man.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-07 5:46

Qt is, without a doubt, the best GUI toolkit I've ever used. It also has some of the best documentation I've ever encountered.

The one major, crushing con is that it pretty much hijacks your entire development process - especially when you're working on a windoz computer - because it has to add an extra "moc" step where it preprocesses your code.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-07 5:48

>>42
That's why I sorta like calling Qt a language. Like Vala or something. What's the point of seeples library if it needs preprocessor to be compiled by seeples compiler?

Name: dasuraga !8GgBtN/zr. 2010-01-07 6:53

>>42
Is it possible to just use Qt's GUI constructs, or am I forced into using Qtstrings et al.? I also downloaded C++ GUI programming with Qt 4...looks pretty well done for the first couple of chapters.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-07 9:45

>>44
You should have downloaded SICP instead.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-07 14:58

C# + Visual Studio.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-07 16:48

>>46
C#+ is not a language.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-07 17:03

Seshrupples

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-07 17:10

>>48
sea octothorpes

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-08 1:29

>>47
/ ++
\ ++

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-08 1:48

>>39
SO
FUCKING
DEEEEP

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-08 3:55

>>52
like her vagina amirite

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-08 4:39

>>53
like whos vagina?

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-08 4:55

>>54
Women's, duh. Ever seen a man with one?

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-08 5:05

>>55

the things I've seen, Anonymous.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-08 5:07

>>56
おしえて、先生!

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-08 6:53

>>54
MY NEY-NEY

Sorry, just came back from /tv/.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-08 9:04

>>58
Did you get Avatold?

Name: Jinnai and the Bugrom 2010-01-08 12:29

>>54
The Titanic's.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-08 18:17

>>40
most browsers suck too..
minimal webkit wrappers like surf, uzbl oder vimprobable may suck less.. but since they all render the web which consists of bloated js/css/flash yada.. it still sucks when used most of the time

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 6:09

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 7:11

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-13 12:30

yes, they're all shit

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List