Project Hosting + Source control

Generally, what do you do for this /prog/? What is your preferred reversioning system (git, svn, etc)? How many people are members of the big project hosting systems or have their own projects on them (github, sourceforge, google-code, launchpad, etc).

Alternatively, how many host your on your own site, or simply locally (offline).

>>23
I don't want a fucking file share or a directory share. I want a god damn service of some kind that allows 24/7 access from anywhere, provided the credentials are right, to a centralized location.

I should not need whatever stupid-ass hacks to achieve this, I should be able to run some daemon. I've attempted to set up such a thing with git, but it proved excessively difficult to configure and set up (with no shortage of hacks).

I don't give a shit about managing local repositories. I want the ability to distribute with a workflow model that I see fit. I can't do that with git. It's either house it locally and fuck you or the alternative, fuck you and use some shitty web service. What is so difficult to understand about this?

>>26
Yes. That is, after all, A BASIC STANDARD FEATURE THAT EVERY OTHER ONE HAS.

Of course, it wouldn't surprise me if you were like the other freetards:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/233421/hosting-git-repository-in-windows

Most of the responses here boil down to:

1. Why would you want to do that? Switch to Linux, you eediot.
2. Use some other software.
3. Use this shitty shared folder hack.

Instead of telling him what he wanted, they were telling him what he should want or some awful hack that is no substitute for basic, standard functionality. I think there are only about two useful responses in there.

God damn it, that attitude is intolerable. Continue peddling your shit software, freetards. Nobody's going to listen.