>>108
No matter how much of a loser you are nowadays, you can get laid just for the sake of it.
I don't think you understand what makes a loser a loser. It's not being ugly, poor, fat, lacking social skills etc, which would make it objectively hard (but not impossible) for them to have sex.
It's when a dude totally
can get laid, and wants to get laid, but somehow doesn't and shames sluts on the internet instead, you know that you see a loser.
Western culture and English language in particular make it kind of hard to talk about the nuances of
being (un)able to do something, with various extremely different external and internal obstacles, for example the very word "loser" lumps together being unlucky, being stupid, and being a loser in its purest sense. I guess it's because of the ideological and historical reasons: in a society oriented on individual success and deriving its moral legitimacy from the idea that anyone can become successful people try not to think too hard about the various ways to fail (somewhat paradoxically, since not considering the possibilities for failure obviously increases one's chances to fail). Look up the word "schlemazel", it does a much better job at capturing the essence of being a loser.