Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Thanks asshole

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 23:13

That would have been entertaining if you'd bothered to kill the whole board, but you just squelched all the active programming discussions and left a bunch of stupid offtopic bullshit threads open.

I hate autistic retards.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 3:09

holy shit. awesome.
good job whoever killed all the front page threads

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 3:10

sup guize I need your help to create a timer in scheme (possibly using the (require web-server/private/timer) module) examples? any help?

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 3:37

what the fuck?  there's a different exploit?

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 4:22

Well well well, looks like I've missed the fun.

I knew that all threads here in /prog/ must be replied, NO EXCEPTIONS and all this shit, but you seem to gone too far. What's this, threads with over 9000 replies?

All of us need to get a life. NOW. NO EXCEPTIONS

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 4:37

This thread has over 9000 replies.
What 9000‽
There's no way you can reply anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 16:25

So I have a basic C program which uses unsigned int foe everything. It's very portable, but now I'd like to add large file support (>4GB). I'm concerned with the standard library calls mostly.

Now technically I should use ssize_t but that doesn't improve anything (it's still 32 bit on 32 bit architectures) and I'm not even sure if that's standard or some GNU crap.

So is it possible to add large file support without resorting to hideous compile/link time options (this is just a .c file, and ideally it'd stay that way) in a really portable way?

I was thinking about workarounding this with some trickery (for example seeking around in 2GB increments - I think this would work even when not explicitly using LFS).

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 16:30

A fatal error occured!
Thread ID specified does not exist.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 16:33

>>46
Use uint64_t, defined in stdint.h.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 16:42

>>48
Pretty sure the standard library calls won't like it.

Maybe use pig disgusting off64_t type and hideous fseeko64 and ftello64 functions. That'll cut portability in half however but should work on most modern systems, I hope.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 16:50

Wasn't that exploit happening because Shiichan (probably) stores threads as plaintext in a similar format to subject.txt?

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 16:53

>>50

stores threads as plaintext
I died a little inside.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 16:55

>>50
lol wut

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 17:13

$thread = file("$boardname/dat/$threadid.dat");
from PrintThread function in include.php

ಠ_ಠ

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 17:50

>>53
hahahaha, wow.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 19:24

I still have an unfixed install. Here's what a nuked .dat file looks like:

newline test<=>Anonymous<=>
Anonymous<><>1259108406<>test<> <>192.168.0.2
<a href="mailto:




lots of blank lines




">Anonymous</a><><>1259108464<>さよなら<> <>192.168.0.2
Over 1000 Thread<><>1259108464<>This thread has over 1000 replies.<br>You can't reply anymore.<>Over 1000<>1.1.1.1

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 19:29

>>37
Network: Rizon
Channel: #4chan

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 19:37

>>53
Going to the /dat/ directory gives me a 403 forbidden page. Good thing that at least was done.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 19:42

>>57
Yeah, it's baffled me how people are able to reply to over 1000 threads since they're set to read-only (440).

Name: namefaggot 2009-11-24 19:46

awwww, don't tell me that names are re-enabled now.
FUCK

Name: Leah Culver !1LEahRIBg. 2009-11-24 19:50

>>59
Guess what else is re-enabled.
They should have kept the forced anon

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 20:27

>>60
Go away, anus girl!

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 21:11

I'm surprised this board script even has exploits after such a long time.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-25 0:57

>>62
I'm surprised this board script has been here for such a long time with so many exploits.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-25 3:25

>>55
So my predictions were right!!
Also, it's funny how Shiichan uses <> for delimiters but at the same time stores HTML in the fields.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-25 10:11

>>64
Why is that funny? <> is not valid HTML.

Many message board scripts that store their data in flat files use the same delimiters.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-25 12:05

>>65
The Great Futaba Script uses the comma.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-25 14:27

>>66
Why not use TABs? TABs are illegal input anyway: the perfect, human readable delimiter. No escaping required.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-25 14:32

    >>67
    Tabs are legal in html,
    what are you smoking?

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-25 14:34

... Oh very nice. Good one Shitchan. Replace the tabs with four spaces, instead of the eight spaces that would result in them lining up with ANYFUCKINGTHING ELSE.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 23:43

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-28 19:53

bump

Name: !WokonZwxw2 2011-03-01 5:47

>>1
You're welcome.

Name: HAXUS THE AUTIST 2011-03-01 5:53

HAXUS THE AUTIST

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-19 21:02

/prog/ will be spammed continuously until further notice. we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List