>>3 While there are among the numerous entries a few that are excellent, this one absolutely delights me. (Not in a homoerotic way.) It's just so rare to find someone who can execute an intelligent joke this well. The design is superb, the reference is classic (and contrary to a previous comment, when done this well it will never grow old), the symbolism is almost profound, and to me it sums up this entire logo selection process. It's like a salute to the wiki contributors who take themselves and their work far too seriously. (Not that the work is a joke, just that some people would do well to lighten up a little.)