Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

http://golang.org/

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-10 22:10

Have you programmed in Google's GO programming language by Google today?

Their Hello World is weeaboo!! It must be good!

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-12 18:27

>>80
Why do you say it looks like MUMPS? I certainly didn't get that impression.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-12 18:29

>>81
He's right, MUMPS felt a lot different.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-12 19:51

>>81,82
Gotcha. ;)

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-12 20:53

i'm tempted to learn just so i can say "i learned Go when it was still less than a year old".

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-12 21:05

>>84
With the way Google rapidly deploys their latest crap, I would expect the Go language to be of widespread use some time in the future. It's probably worth learning it now.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-12 21:15

>>79
I haven't tested it buy maybe you need to create more than 100 for them to share threads.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-12 22:11

>>86
Nah, I tried it with 100,000 but it died on me during a call to clone() (theirs, not Linux's) after about 8000 goroutines. These all just go to sleep for roughly ever. Each goroutine was spawning another host process every step of the way.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-12 22:51

>>79
>>87
Post your code and let's try and figure out what's happening.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-12 22:57

>>79,86,87
Never mind, I'm just a retard. I didn't realize that time.Sleep() actually causes the host process to block and so spawns another. Now I want a 'lightweight' Sleep().

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-13 1:00

GOTO considered harmful (not by Google obviously).

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-13 1:05

>>90
They put training wheels on it dude.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-13 1:47

>>90-91
Sorry, anyone who's not using goto in C is a damn fool.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-13 1:54

>>92
Your comment does not refer to any thread context.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-13 10:28

>>90
Not using goto for error handling because you're afraid Dijkstra's ghost is going scorn you in front of your friends is the hallmark of a programmer too insecure to be of value.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-13 10:30

s/handling/\0 in C/

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-13 10:37

>>94
Worse still, the majority of snickering "goto considered harmful" morons use break, continue and all of the other language features that Dijkstra despised, even though they are essentially gotos.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-13 12:20

>>96
I'm an extremist: Branches considered harmful.

All machine code must write the code to follow. This is why we need 128bit instruction sets people!

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-13 18:56

>>97
That's not nearly extreme enough: Integers considered harmful

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-14 3:28

>>98
Semiconductors considered harmful. What we need is more tubes.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-14 4:00

BROROUTINES

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-14 4:38

>>100
I'd let a hot japanese girl perform her routines on my erect bro, if you catch my drift.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-14 8:55

>>100
I'd give The Cudder a go with my routines, if you know what I'm talking about.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-14 9:01

>>102
You're into transsexuals? Well...each to his own, I guess...

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-14 21:24

lk

Name: cheap ugg boots 2010-08-16 22:35

Helpful material shared I’m very delighted to go through this particular article..thanks for presenting us great information.Fantastic walk-through. I enjoy this article.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-17 6:27

>>54
I am really not understanding this argument. Why does it matter if thousands of threads each use a 5 MB stack? This stack is virtual memory. It's simply address space; it does not need to be allocated by the operating system unless you access it. So what the hell is the point of segmented stacks?

I understand that there are theoretical performance benefits to userland threads, but those are a long way from proven. Java had this idea too, you know; they originally had virtual userland threads, but they switched to native threads around 1.2 or 1.3 because they got better performance that way. But segmented stacks? Fucking useless.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-17 14:41

>>106
Host threads have improved a lot recently, but getting better performance out of them than your own implementation just means your own implementation is bad to start with.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-19 14:55

C99 is all you need.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-19 19:11

>>106

Check out GHC for some pretty sweet userland threads.  Of course, Java comes from Sun, who made Solaris, which had an M:N threading model, which was utter ridiculous crap.  Give me 1:1 any day of the week.

All you need is C99.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-19 19:20

>>109
What is that ratio about, threads:processes? If so, assuming M<=N, what's the problem?

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-20 3:10

>>110
Maybe you should make an effort to understand the subject matter before you try to join a discussion.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-20 8:47

>>111
I was trying to understand what you had to say. Now I suspect you of having nothing at all to say.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-20 13:10

>>110
Userland threads : kernel threads

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-23 20:41

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 7:22

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:13

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -