Scsh

Anyone here using scsh? What do you think about it? I have developed a real hatred for bash lately.

Why have you developer a real hatred for bash lately?

Why do you say you have developer a real hatred for bash lately?

Use rc.

bash was here. scsh is loser

[b][m]I fucking love bash soo much its make me have wild orgasms. Oh the ecstacy. I scream out loud, my body writhing with sure delight as I combine command after command in an elegant efficient manner.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAAAA!!!
you think your tough huh?
one word TAB COMPLETION OF COMMANDS
i have taken out two mission critical applications at the same time in less than 5 seconds i have been training for 3 years.
also enterprise grade best practices.
your shell might be bigger than me,but i know mine is smarter and quicker.
my .bashrc is 130 kb pure lean code.
one keystroke and i'll overflow your buffers.
your the one whose a nerd.i can optimize $PATH anytime i want you probably haven't ever touched .profile before.
you probably have sex with your computer.
you don't even know me,and you don't want to.
you'll be lucky if your even worth my attention one look at my aliases and you'll dissappear forever.
though i'd be hapy to humiliate you in front of all your friends.
btw IM the expertest.
i have worked in maine, new hampshire, new york,utah, colorado,florida,bahamas.
never indented my code!
im undefeated in competitive obfuscation of code.
im on my way to IOCCC.
go ahead and come step anytime you want.b*tch

zsh was here, scsh is a nigger

tcsh > *

tclsh was here, you can all eat a dick.

pbaztclsh was here, tclsh is loser.

I want someone to port 4DOS to Unix.

If scsh were intended as an interactive shell, I would finally abandon fish.

I enjoy the hmash.

php-shell was here, bash is actually pretty good

zsh was here, I don't give a shit bout whatcha use

ghci was here, unlines $ map ((">>" ++) . (++ " sucks.").show) [1..17]

>>10
This. Unless someone else has another shell that can fix your typos, check your mail, merge your history across multiple concurrent logins, and has programmable, smart tab completion (e.g. s.mp3 TAB -> "some song with a long title.mp3"), and still only takes 450kb on disk, tcsh wins.
Sucks for scripting, but that's why you use bash for that and tcsh for logins.

Now, zsh can do all that, if you spend hours fucking with your rc file, and read the thousand pages of documentation to find out how to get it to do very simple things that shouldn't need more than one bullet point. If you have the time to waste, go for it. (But then, zsh is also six megabytes for some insane reason. Emacs much?)

>>19
Sir, I tip my hat to you. I'm downloading tcsh as we speak.

zoidberg
fuck your .?sh

>>19
zsh is also six megabytes for some insane reason
672656 bytes here, maybe your binary is statically linked.

>>19
omg 6mb what do I do there is no space on my 500gb hd.

>>23
It really saddens me to see that people go out of their way to spend so much money on such expensive hardware and then squander their investment by running barely suitable software on it. To me, an extra 0.1% binary size decrease, even if I am only imagining it to be smaller, is certainly worth one day a week recompiling all of the latest packages from source code. Even if I do occasionally get my CFLAGS in a muddle! I think I speak for /prog/ when I say that tcsh is the only sane option for getting the most from your hardware.

>>22
Ah, you have made the classic mistake of assuming that the program is wholly contained within the binary. Try looking through /usr/lib/zsh and /usr/share/zsh as well. And remember that all of those scripts need to be loaded into memory when the shell starts. (This is why logging in is noticeably slower with zsh than with tcsh.)

>>23
I don't object to zsh because it is six megabytes, I object because those six megabytes do not correspond to even close to a 1300% increase in functionality compared with tcsh.

>>25
It only loads the ones it uses.

/prog/ will be spammed continuously until further notice. we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.