int* p vs. int *p

What do you think about the difference between the following declarations? Which do you prefer?

int* p;
int *p;

It's often said the first is C++ style and the second is C style. I prefer C but conceptually the first declaration makes a lot more sense to me. You're defining a variable p of type int*. p is an int*. You dereference it, *p, when you want the int. Makes sense. The second example to me seems like gobbledygook, but it's the way the C authors thought of it, because of this bullshit:

int *p, *q;

So what the fuck is the deal? Can someone who uses "int *p" syntax explain to me what goes through your head when you write that garbage?

>>30
You're an idiot; >>14,21 is right. C# is the next level of C/C++ (C -> C++ -> C#).  It uses the idea of classes (OOP), and int* means a class of type integer pointer.  It's newer and they fixed the mistake found in C (int *p), which is an int type of the name *p.