So I was contemplating this paradox yesterday: If I had to, nay, MUST make a choice between having sex in my life or having programming, which would I choose?
I'm still pondering this, what does /prog/ think? Let's do a quick poll, just post either "I'd choose Sex!" or "I choose programing!" or something to that effect. I'm really interested in this question and would love to hear /prog/'s opinion on this...
>>488
I realise that this is a troll and that you aren't stupid enough to take the car of a function, but [Anonymous@/prog/ ~]$ ikarus
Ikarus Scheme version 0.0.3
Copyright (c) 2006-2008 Abdulaziz Ghuloum
(cons (cons (car car) cdr) cdr)
Unhandled exception
Condition components:
1. &assertion
2. &who: car
3. &message: "argument does not have required pair structure"
4. &irritants: (#<procedure car>)
[Anonymous@/prog/ ~]$ mzscheme
Welcome to MzScheme v4.2.1 [3m], Copyright (c) 2004-2009 PLT Scheme Inc. (cons (cons (car car) cdr) cdr)
car: expects argument of type <pair>; given #<procedure:car>
[Anonymous@/prog/ ~]$ sbcl
This is SBCL 1.0.30, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.
More information about SBCL is available at <http://www.sbcl.org/>;.
SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty.
It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under
BSD-style licenses. See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the
distribution for more information.
* (cons (cons (car car) cdr) cdr)
debugger invoked on a UNBOUND-VARIABLE in thread #<THREAD "initial thread" RUNNING {A9036C1}>:
The variable CAR is unbound.
Type HELP for debugger help, or (SB-EXT:QUIT) to exit from SBCL.
restarts (invokable by number or by possibly-abbreviated name):
0: [ABORT] Exit debugger, returning to top level.
(SB-INT:SIMPLE-EVAL-IN-LEXENV CAR #<NULL-LEXENV>)
0]