Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

I would like to...

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-16 4:05

Learn Haskell. What about xmonad?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-16 4:24

Yes, what about it?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-16 4:30

Nothing about it, live it alon!

Name: TRUE TRUTH EXPERT !!TthtFzrtPXElUy7 2009-10-16 8:39

rEAD yaht (http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Haskell/YAHT). xMONAD IS EASY TO SET UP. gET A HASKELL IMPLEMENTATION WORKING ON YOUR COMP (http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Implementations), THEN DARCS http://darcs.net/, WHICH IS ABLE TO INSTALL VARIOUS OTHER GOODIES TO YOUR COMP EXCEPT XMONAD, JUST READ THE DOCS. oNCE YOU'VE ACQUIRED XMONAD, READ (http://xmonad.org/documentation.html).

(i'D RATHER USE EMACS!)

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-16 12:31

Xmonad has the crippling weakness of not being written in C.

LINUX HERE, HASKELL IS A KATAMARI DAMACY

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-16 15:21

>>5
Or rather, it has the crippling weakness of being written by people who wouldn't use C to write a window manager. The language itself is incidental.

Name: TRUE TRUTH EXPERT !!TthtFzrtPXElUy7 2009-10-16 15:40

dON'T WORRY op, >>5 AND >>6 PROBABLY HAVEN'T EVEN INITIALIZED THE X SYSTEM FORM THEIR APPS DIRECTLY.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-16 23:53

urgh. haskell is such a painful language!

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-16 23:53

>>8
*raises eyebrow* Something wrong?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-17 0:03

>>9
The syntax perhaps.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-17 0:13

>>8,10
Really, Haskell's syntax is just excruciating and constantly getting in the way. There is just NO REASON for it to have so much special-purpose syntax and so many different operators and keywords (even more than C++).

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-17 0:26

>>11
It's all sugar though, you don't have to use most of it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-17 0:33

>>12
All of the crazy made-up operators are just sugar?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-17 0:37

>>11
The purpose is to make things readable. It must suck to have deficient comprehensions skills like yours

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-17 0:41

>>14
It must suck to have deficient grammer skillz like yours

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-17 1:57

>>14
It must feel ｔｅｒｒｉｂｌｅ to make ad-hominem attacks like yours, instead of actually admitting that Haskell is a gay!!

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-17 2:03

>>11
Yeah, it's bizarre that so many otherwise intelligent people are willing to navigate Haskell's mazelike syntax. Back to Lisp, I guess.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-17 2:05

I'm still waiting to find a time to use my HASKELL SKILLZ!!!!  It's honestly a fun language with painful syntax that you will never use.
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -