/prog/ - Macgyver :D

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 0:22

i just wanna be like him
:)

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 2:40

The Sussman :D
i just wanna be like him
:)

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 3:47

Hitler :D
i just wanna be like him
:)

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 3:48

H̷̶̷̢̠̯̹̳͉͖̲̥̤͙̲̦̣̼̠̙̭̰̆ͣ̄̊̓͒ͧ̂ͮ͌ͬ͂͒̽̀̆̀ȩ̴̢̹̥͖̭̹̪̯̥̦ͦ͊̎̊͘͢ ̴̈̔ͮ̆̽ͩ̉̈҉̵̢̰̳͕̰̮͔̻̰͞c̸̵̗̭͇̰̲̠̗͉̞͋̊̌̓̓̾͡o̷̢̢̘͍̹̥̮͇͓̯͈̝̲̬͈͓̠̩̾ͥ̆m̵̍͆ͩͬ͗̄̃͐҉̷̢̗̙͚̭̥͈̗̭̱̣̞̰̟̳̘̜ĕ̄̏͌̀̚̚͘҉̬̖̤͉̤͙̦̙̞̮̯͔̼̩͕s̯̫̩̫̱̳͛ͬͭ̾ͦ̏̿̅̈̈̇ͪ͛͋ͤͫ̆ͤ͝
̶̷̧̭̮̫̜̈́ͩͪ̋ͪͫ̐̽͠S͔͖͔̜̝͇̞̤̮̗͍̪̝̞̹̩͕̭̳̋͂̐̊̍͛͐́͛̄ͤ̚̕͟Ů̞̣̤̮͇͈̱̪͇̼͇̦͔͓̂̿͐ͤ͐̇̒̌̂̈́̆̕S̴̷̶̨͉̠̰̼̤̬͎͙̞͗͌̈̓̋ͦS̨̳̹̬͖̲̞̜̥̗͚̖̺̬̞͍̘̝̈̏͒̅̽̑ͤ̄̆͋̄͗ͯͫ̈́̏̌̅́͡M̶̨͎̭̟̠͔̙͙̞̭̹̘̱̫̽̇ͯ͛ͣͥͯ͋̋̅̄̚͘A̵̶͌̓́̓̏̐͂͂̄̉͛̏ͨ͝͏̹̞͓̝͎̺N̫̜͙̩̗͑̐ͮ̓̾̃̾́͠!̸̶͎͖̪̣̖̦͕̻͖͎̪̪̮̘̠̮͈̼ͯͬ̀̎͒̑̽̃͋͜
ͫͤͦ͑ͫ̈́̃́ͦͦͫ́͏̨̢̩̥̘̯̗̬̞͓̯̞̪̱͖̺͖͇͚

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 4:35

>>4
It's so beautiful ಥ_ಥ

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 8:51

`(,display ,@((call/cc (lambda (c) c)) 3))

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 8:52

>>6
In what language do you think you are writing?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 9:45

>>5
I disagree.

http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/7162/ffox.png

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 15:41

>>7
Liskell

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 16:14

>>9
Hasp is superior

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 16:21

JAVASCRIPT IS THE RULER OF ALL SCRIPTING LANGUAGES!

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 16:26

>>11
U MENA PERL
I understand your confusion, grasshopper, but all will become clear as you travel the Path.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 16:55

>>12
Javascript may be to Lisp as PHP is to Perl, but Perl is to programming languages as wood chippers are to vaginas.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 17:01

>>13
You obviously do not know the pleasure of being Perled inside.
Perl is made of pure awesomeness.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 17:12

>>14
Go home, Larry. Perl is a horrific mess, mostly because it tries to emulate natural language, which any idiot could tell you is a horrible idea in a programming language not aimed at young girls.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 17:13

>>15
You obviously do not know the pleasure of being Perled inside.
Perl is made of pure awesomeness.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 17:13

Lisp + Haskell = MAGIC

Name: TRUE TRUTH EXPERT !!TthtFzrtPXElUy7 2009-10-14 17:14

Perl is cool, but you won't convince me to use it instead of lisp.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 17:51

>>18
Using proper capitalization like a real Anonymous
OH MY GODDDDDDDDDD

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 18:01

>>19
>oH MY GODDDDDDDDDD
ftfy

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 18:29

>>17
Did you mean, "Lisp + Haskell = MAGIC"?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 18:36

>>21

Spell has to do with magic. I don't even know what a Likell is.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 4:12

>>4
You ruined this thread.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 6:43

>>18
write a lisp interpreter in perl .

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 6:53

>>24
write a perl interpreter in lisp

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 7:22

>>25
write a lambda calculus interpreter in prolog

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 9:25

>>26
write a prolog interpreter in lambda calculus

expecting a full parser/lexer/tokenizer in half an hour, 'kay

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 16:47

>>27
except lambda calculus does not deal with state, so you're exercise is impossible to accompish

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 16:53

>>28
You better be trolling, if it can't be done in lambda calculus it can't be done with any programming language.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 16:55

>>28
DO THE IMPOSSIBLE
SEE THE INVISIBLE
BREAK THE UNBREAKABLE
ROW ROW FIGHT DA POWAH

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 16:58

>>29
YHBT

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 18:54

>>29
Parsing is all about keeping state. Lambda expressions don't hold state. What's so hard to understand?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 19:03

>>32
Has never parsed a list in a functional manner

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 19:07

>>29
can lambda calculus use gotos?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 19:09

>>34
Doesn't need them ;)

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 19:55

>>35
Then it can't solve complex problems that require them.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 19:59

>>36
Here's an exercise. Write a memory manager in lambda calculus. Oh that's right, you can't because you can't do shit in lambda calculus. How do you like that?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 20:34

>>36
What problems are these? I'm sure the vast majority of goto uses can be worked around even if hackishly.

>>37
Since Scheme can basically be reduced down to the lambda calculus, and I can write a memory manager in Scheme. I refute your point.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 20:50

>>37
Lambda calculus is touring complete, anything computable can be computed using lambda calculus.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 21:19

>>38,39
This is what Lisp users actually believe.

Macgyver :D

1 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 0:22

2 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 2:40

3 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 3:47

4 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 3:48

5 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 4:35

6 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 8:51

7 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 8:52

8 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 9:45

9 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 15:41

10 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 16:14

11 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 16:21

12 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 16:26

13 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 16:55

14 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 17:01

15 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 17:12

16 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 17:13

17 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 17:13

18 Name: TRUE TRUTH EXPERT !!TthtFzrtPXElUy7 2009-10-14 17:14

19 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 17:51

20 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 18:01

21 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 18:29

22 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 18:36

23 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 4:12

24 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 6:43

25 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 6:53

26 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 7:22

27 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 9:25

28 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 16:47

29 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 16:53

30 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 16:55

31 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 16:58

32 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 18:54

33 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 19:03

34 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 19:07

35 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 19:09

36 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 19:55

37 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 19:59

38 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 20:34

39 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 20:50

40 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 21:19

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 0:22

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 2:40

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 3:47

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 3:48

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 4:35

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 8:51

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 8:52

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 9:45

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 15:41

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 16:14

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 16:21

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 16:26

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 16:55

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 17:01

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 17:12

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 17:13

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 17:13

Name: TRUE TRUTH EXPERT !!TthtFzrtPXElUy7 2009-10-14 17:14

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 17:51

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 18:01

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 18:29

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 18:36

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 4:12

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 6:43

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 6:53

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 7:22

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 9:25

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 16:47

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 16:53

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 16:55

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 16:58

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 18:54

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 19:03

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 19:07

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 19:09

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 19:55

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 19:59

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 20:34

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 20:50

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 21:19