Building Tuple

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/dd942829.aspx

They're proud of it, damn it! It just wouldn't feel right to walk up to him and tell him that this would be trivial if their poor excuse for metaprogramming by way of generics didn't suck balls (``we didn't feel the time we would spend adding eight more tuple types would be worth it'', WTF?!1), and that anyone using tuples are damn well gonna compare them either structurally or not at all. It would be like kicking a puppy.

And what's with the ads? Are MS so poor they have to scrounge for small change in their developer resources now?

>>4
I don't think you understand how it works.  There is going to be overhead somewhere if you implement stuff that isn't used.
Um, bullshit? Tell me, in C++, where is the overhead if you don't use operator< in std::pair?