/prog/ - My new text markup langage

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-01 12:11

It's better than BBCode:

`b`i`o`u{I AM AN EXPERT PROGRAMMER}

`sup{NO `sup{MORE `sup{NESTING `sub{PROBLEMS`b`i{!!}}}}}

Also, the parser in Haskell is 30 lines.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-05 15:18

>>40
I believe you missed either an h or to, sir.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-05 15:24

HASCAL

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-05 15:59

>>41
s/were/where/

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-05 16:45

>>40
Nah, probably you just suck at it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 1:43

>>1
You're implementation sucks.

sup("NO" + sup("MORE") + sup("NESTING") + sub("PROBLEMS" + b(i(!!))))

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 1:47

>>45
A little too LISPY. Take your TOY MARKUP LANGUAGE elsewhere!

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 1:50

>>46
I peed into my trash bin a little.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 2:15

for the aspiring php developer:

function f($i="", $str="") {

    switch($i) {

        case "sup":

            echo "<sup>".$str."</sup>";

            break;

        case "sub":

            echo "<sub>".$str."</sub>";

            break;

        case "b":

            echo "<b>".$str."</b>";

            break;

        case "i":

            echo "<i>".$str."</i>";

            break;

        case "o":

            echo "<o>".$str."</o>";

            break;

        case "u":

            echo "<u>".$str."</u>";

            break;

        }

    }

    

    f("sup", "NO" . f("sup", "MORE") . f("sup", "NESTING") . f("sup", "PROBLEMS") . f("b" f("i", "!!")));

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 2:22

>>48
fag

function sub($str="") { echo "<sup>".$str."</sup>"; }

function sup($str="") { echo "<sub>".$str."</sub>"; }

function b($str="") { echo "<b>".$str."</b>"; }

function i($str="") { echo "<i>".$str."</i>"; }

function o($str="") { echo "<o>".$str."</o>"; }

function u($str="") { echo "<u>".$str."</u>"; }

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 2:30

>>49

IMPROVED PHPEPPLES EDITION:

class bbcode {

    public static function sub($str="") { echo "<sup>".$str."</sup>"; }

    public static function sup($str="") { echo "<sub>".$str."</sub>"; }

    public static function b($str="") { echo "<b>".$str."</b>"; }

    public static function i($str="") { echo "<i>".$str."</i>"; }

    public static function o($str="") { echo "<o>".$str."</o>"; }

    public static function u($str="") { echo "<u>".$str."</u>"; }

}



bbcode :: sup("NO" . sup("MORE") . sup("NESTING") . sub("PROBLEMS" . b(i("!!"))));

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 2:32

>>50
doesn't work

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 10:26

>>50

ROCKSTAR PHUBY EDITION!

class BbCode

{

    private function tag($name, $contents)

    {

        return sprintf('<%s>%s</%s>', $name, $contents, $name);

    }    



    public function __call($method, $args)

    {

          $content = isset($args[0]) ? $args[0] : '';

          return $this->tag($method, $contents);

    }

}



$b = new BbCode();

echo $b->b($b->u($b->o($b->sup('D').'S'.$b->sub('L'))));

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 10:48

this reminds me of buttsortz

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 11:42

>>45
Have fun evaling things

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 13:52

>>6
i didnt know you need lines in perl ?
why has no one told me ?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 14:19

>>52
so how is rubby formed?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 15:03

>>56
how rubby get classes?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-25 14:02

class BBCode

    def method_missing(name, content="")

        tag(name.to_s, content)

    end 



    def tag(name, content)

        "[" + name + "]" + content + "[/" + name + "]" 

    end 

end

irb(main):001:0> load "bbcode.rb"

=> true

irb(main):002:0> b = BBCode.new

=> #<BBCode:0x7fcb9c9a6c70>

irb(main):003:0> b.i(b.o(b.u(b.b("BAMPU " + b.sup(b.sup(b.sup(b.sup("PANTSU"))))))))

=> "

BAMPU ^{^{^{^PANTSU}}}"

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-25 14:27

You guys, Xarn has blown the field wide open. All of your dabblings can't hold a candle to his revolutionary SexpCode!

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-25 14:46

>>59
Big deal, I've been using an sexpression based BBCode language for months, hell I even posted chunks of it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-25 15:01

I'm pretty sure that all posts mentioning Xarn are made by Xarn himself. Including this one.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-25 15:16

>>61
Since half of them seem to be making fun of him (including >>59), I don't think that's true.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-25 20:47

>>62
Is it so unlikely that someone can be so self-deprecating?

I am a massive homosexual, and a failure of a human being

My new text markup langage

1 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-01 12:11

41 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-05 15:18

42 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-05 15:24

43 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-05 15:59

44 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-05 16:45

45 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 1:43

46 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 1:47

47 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 1:50

48 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 2:15

49 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 2:22

50 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 2:30

51 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 2:32

52 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 10:26

53 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 10:48

54 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 11:42

55 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 13:52

56 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 14:19

57 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 15:03

58 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-25 14:02

59 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-25 14:27

60 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-25 14:46

61 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-25 15:01

62 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-25 15:16

63 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-25 20:47