Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

E-peen tiem

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 20:50

What's the best program you've ever made?
Both in terms of quality and complexity.
Personally, I've made a basic cli calculator with some trigonometric functions included.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 21:03

obligatory "i wrote an ansi C compiler when i was 12 years old"

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 21:05

I was proud of my Shiichan viewer, until I realised it was inferior to w3m

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-12 0:03

>>3
I wrote an ANSI C compiler when I was 16, it actually wouldn't be that difficult for a twelve year old if they read a few books. Why is this a meme?

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-12 0:32

I got Hurd to run on my machine. I'm working on porting Linux drivers.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-12 1:11

>>6
lies. hurd doesn't really exist.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-12 4:44

>>5
12 year olds reading programming language standards and books about compiler design
doh ho ho

Name: bitches and hoes 2009-09-12 5:50

bitches and hoes

Name: bitches and hoes 2009-09-12 6:02

>>9

hey i didnt write that!

bitches and hoes

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-12 6:19

A small Windows program for entering of order related data, and drawings and documents and stuff for automated generation of O.A. mails and printing of documents for documentation to customers. And also generating of CD interface, to save on environment and money.

It's used daily by over 20 persons.

Biggest crap ewer :D, but it works and that whats counts sometimes. Desperately in need of a real EIM strategy.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-12 6:39

;_;


fibs

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-12 6:45

Simple 2D physics integrator I wrote - at least I thought it was the shit until I realized how inaccurate Euler integration was.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-12 7:19

/* Copyright (c) 2008 Anonymous
 *
 * Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any
 * purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that you grant this
 * same permission to anyone you distribute it to without any additional
 * restrictions.
 *
 * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES
 * WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
 * MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR
 * ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES
 * WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN
 * ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
 * OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
 */

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;

class BBCoder
{ public static void Main(string[] args)
  { string[] bbcode = new string[] {"aa", "b", "i", "m", "o", "s", "spoiler", "sub", "sup", "u"};
    Stack<string> tag_stack = new Stack<string>();
    Random rand = new Random();
    foreach(string arg in args)
    { if(rand.Next(2) != 0 && tag_stack.Count != 0) Console.Write("[/" + tag_stack.Pop() + "] " + arg);
      else
      { tag_stack.Push(bbcode[rand.Next(bbcode.Length)]);
        Console.Write(" [" + tag_stack.Peek() + "]" + arg); }}
    while(tag_stack.Count != 0) Console.Write("[/" + tag_stack.Pop() + "]");
    Console.WriteLine(); }}

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-12 7:34

The biggest programs I've written were commercial, but I'm not very proud of them: they had to be hacked up to incorporate whatever was needed at the time, but they do work as intended.

I'm writing something for myself now, and I'm much more happy with the code I'm writing. It's a ``smart'' RCE toolkit.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-12 8:21

>>15
enjoy wanking in your basement

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-12 8:29

>>16
Thank you, sir. Writing code for oneself is enjoyable.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-12 8:32

>>13
I'm writing a 2D integration library benchmark right now. What algorithm did you use? Can I check-out your code?

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-12 8:36

>>1
Can't remember really. I'd say a geometry library in C++ with some algorithms like Voronoi triangulation or that FEM implementation I did for a numeric simulation course. Or maybe that one synthetic social network experiment.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-12 8:53

>>17
couldn't agree with you more.
using your own hand crafted tools is an awesome feeling

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-12 11:17

>>18
I just flipped through my physics textbook for the equations, it's relatively simple, IMO.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-12 13:21

>>11
It sounds OK, but you should have considered a Service Oriented Architecture using XML Schema to describe your data, a J2EE backend running on IBM WebSphere Process Server, and UI/forms implemented by IBM Business Space powered by Lotus Mashups, so your 20 users can easily log in to the LDAP-configured intranet site and interact with custom portlets to complete user tasks by filling out the Lotus XFDL forms.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-12 20:48

>>8
I actually read K&R when I was 12 and thought about how one might implement a C compiler in C, although I never actually implemented one.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-12 23:21

>>7
I'm a computer wizard and I know how to incant the spells that conjure the spirits of my computer. I can make Hurd work for me and now, I'm working on improving it for the benefit of other Hurd users.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-12 23:39

>>24

Both of us would appreciate it

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-12 23:56

>>24
What's the point of Hurd when Linux exists?

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-13 0:03

>>26

What's the point of Linux when DOS exists?

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-13 0:05

>>27
I meant that the GNU project already has a usable kernel for the programs, so why do they need another?

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-13 0:16

>>28

Because it's not theirs?

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-13 0:27

>>29
It's functionally the same. It seems like they are re-inventing the wheel for no good reason.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-13 0:40

>>29
Since GNU/Linux is not GNU enough, they'll probably name it GNU/GNU/Hurd or GNU/rms/GNU/Hurd.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-13 0:42

>>31
I think they left it as Hurd on their site because it's part of GNU.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-13 0:57

>>30

I think you're overestimating the HURD

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-13 1:22

>>33
U MENA HUURRRRrrD???

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-13 2:22

>>33
I was comparing the two from HURD's plan and what Linux currently is. I must agree with you though, HURD is pretty shitty right now.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-13 11:12

>>26
It's got a great design and it's grossly incomplete. This makes it perfect for bored hackers that are interested in experimental OS development.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-13 11:23

>>35

I mean, I think it's a weird thing to say that HURD will be Linux so why bother.

I mean "Just because" should be a good enough reason. The other would be ``[ol]MICROKERNALS[/ol]'' > monorithic

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-13 15:33

A Scheme interpreter in Python.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-13 16:13

my favorite program i made wasn't anything huge but it is the one i am most proud of. and that would be my keylogger with a full gui, it was wrote in autohotkey and c++

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-13 16:48

A Lisp interpreter in Ruby.
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -