/prog/ - The next Leah Culver?

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-09 14:38

http://nadiana.com/about

1) Python
2) Hot

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 13:07

>>40
While I agree with you, I don't think the dyke percentage is that high although the transgender percentage is ridiculous

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 13:09

>> 40-san
I'm saying higher than the background populace. 2/3 times higher.
I didn't note the TG contingent, but that may have been the environment where I was too.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 13:42

>>40
What if I'm interested in men? Should I go for the geek guy or the alpha male?

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 13:46

>>43
That means you're gay, and gay = bad!

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 13:58

>>44
Don't bring me down bro :(

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 14:29

>>45
Don't worry bro they're working on a cure for homosexuality.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 15:08

>>45
Did you mean: Don't bring me down groos

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 15:21

>>46
>:[

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 15:54

>>47
Did you mean: Don't bring me down Groosalugg ?

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 16:06

>>49
Did you mean: “Did you mean: Did you mean: Don't bring me down [spoiler]Groosalugg /[spoiler]?”

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 16:15

>>50
[i][b]BBCODE FAILURE[/i][/b]

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 16:44

Who is Leah Culver? Wikipedia doesn't say anything

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 16:48

>>52
She should be mentioned on the Pownce page

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 16:52

I am sorry I only care about Touhous.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 17:13

>>52
13:41, 18 June 2008 Ultraexactzz (talk | contribs) deleted "Leah Culver" ‎ (A7 (bio): Real person; doesn't indicate importance/significance)

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 20:48



"GRUNNUR"

;

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 20:52

>>46
i lol'd my ass off

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 21:41

>>40
I want a good looking woman with decent tits that isn't a bitch.
Who the fuck wants a geek girl?

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 22:58

>>40
Women should be good-looking, good-at-cooking, and completely obedient. Notice how these requirements do not include "smart."

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 2:21

>>59
Yeah.. no. Why exactly would you want a girlfriend who has no idea what you are talking about, when she asks you about work?

"Oh, what are you doing, Honey?"
"Nothing much. Just writing some algorithms."
"...rhythms? OH! You're teaching the computer how to dance?"

Imagine that. Everyday.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 2:28

>>60
I think >>59-kun said they don't have to be smart. That doesn't mean they're retarded.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 2:35

>>61
Point taken.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 3:01

>>62
Also I'll tell you about 2 girls I know. One's smarter than the other, but the less smart one was really fun to be around with. The smart one is incredibly boring and is a weaboo and basically just talks about JAPAN AND ANIME~~~ KAWAII and what she did the previous day. So a smarter girl doesn't necessarily mean better company.

Although there was this other girl who was smarter than them both and also played video games. Too bad she wasn't pretty :(

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 3:09

>>63
Talk about a lose, win lose situation.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 3:15

>>63
The smart one is incredibly boring and is a weaboo and basically just talks about JAPAN AND ANIME~~~ KAWAII and what she did the previous day.
Wait what, how did you get the idea that she was smart anyway?

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 3:20

I regretted clicking on it after reading ~ 4 posts in this thread.

Also, I think she's a Muslim or something.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 3:33

I dream of cocks drifting across the blue sky.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 3:48

>>65
She's good at math and understands new things pretty quickly. Too bad she's boring as fuck.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 4:27

There wasn't even a first Leah Culver.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 5:49

✈ ▌▌

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 6:13

>>40
Knock them out with a copy of sick-pee and rape them. Woo hoo.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 6:15

nobody gives a shit about these kinds of threads.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 6:18

>>72
The other two posters on /prog/ disagree

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-22 5:06

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 22:50

<

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 14:17

<-- check my doubles

Name: 2012-01-25 7:22

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-25 10:08

This is now an ENGINEERING THREAD!

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-25 13:35

>>79
faggot

Newer Posts

The next Leah Culver?

1 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-09 14:38

41 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 13:07

42 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 13:09

43 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 13:42

44 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 13:46

45 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 13:58

46 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 14:29

47 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 15:08

48 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 15:21

49 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 15:54

50 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 16:06

51 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 16:15

52 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 16:44

53 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 16:48

54 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 16:52

55 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 17:13

56 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 20:48

57 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 20:52

58 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 21:41

59 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-10 22:58

60 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 2:21

61 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 2:28

62 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 2:35

63 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 3:01

64 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 3:09

65 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 3:15

66 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 3:20

67 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 3:33

68 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 3:48

69 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 4:27

70 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 5:49

71 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 6:13

72 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 6:15

73 Name: Anonymous 2009-09-11 6:18

75 Name: Anonymous 2010-12-22 5:06

76 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 22:50

77 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 14:17

78 Name: 2012-01-25 7:22

79 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-25 10:08

80 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-25 13:35