66
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-25 7:45
>>44
Haskell is the best choice for functional programming.
Perl is the best choice for nothing because ruby is better in every way at the exact same thing.
67
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-25 10:55
>>62
>implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying >implying
68
Name:
67
2012-01-25 10:56
i normally always sage, but i must bump programming related threads in the presence of such spam.
69
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-25 11:01
>>1
Hi I don't even know what this is trying to do
71
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-25 16:57
>>69
Try reading the thread with your eyes open.
73
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-26 13:01
>>70
>>71
nope still not got it . Something to do with hashes. Why's it called cycle?
74
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-26 13:06
Someone's a mental midget.
75
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-26 14:30
>>1
Or you could use Array.cycle ?
76
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-26 14:32
>>75
I MENA Array.rotate / rotate!
79
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-26 14:35
rotate my cycle until closure
80
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-26 18:22
#!/usr/bin/env ruby1.9
N=ARGV[0].to_i
B=ARGV[1].to_i
Array.new(N<B ? N : B) {|i|N.to_s(i+2)}.each_with_index{|e,i|e.match(/(\d)\1$/)&&printf("[%02d] %s\n",i+2,e) }
Ah the pleasure of being cummed inside