Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

C++ IDE

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-15 6:02

Hi /prog/

I'm searching for a C/C++ IDE for Linux that:
- Runs natively (no java, no vm, I need speed;
- Provides intelligent code completion;
- Allows compiling steps configuration (i.e. customized makefile);

I'd like to know what does the EXPERT PROGRAMMER suggest.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-15 21:41

>>39
W-(

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-15 21:51

>>40
You don't seem to have understood what you just read, so I'll recap. It's not necessary to memorize every detail of an API ot use it. It's not necessary to use code completion since docs are more helpful. You should refactor your code so you don't need to refer to obscure parts of some API constantly. Why you think I'm a Java programmer I can't imagine, unless maybe you don't know any languages at all.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-15 22:03

>>42
You know what? I completely misread your post. I thought you were >>36 replying to >>37 and being awkward in saying that the alternative to code completion is memorizing all APIs you would want to use.
I apologize.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-15 22:20

>>43
Now I feel bad for being mean when the nature of your mistake was pretty obvious. :(

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 0:46

>>46
                       //`'''```,
             o        // LISP   `.,
       ,....OOo.   .c;.',,,.'``.,,.`
    .'      ____.,'.//
   / _____  \___/.'
  | / ||  \\---\|
  ||  ||   \\  ||
  co  co    co co

Name: =*=F=R=O=Z=E=N==V=O=I=D=*= 2009-08-20 11:06

I personally use Notepad2 and avoid any "makefiles"(which i consider bloated and poor design)

I use one include file for everything.
#include "void.h" //handles all the common functions,#defines,#ifdefs and #includes

Anything which uses makefiles is defective Sepples-level shit.
All the C code posts on my blog are void.h merged with somefile.c

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-20 11:22

>>48
expert programmer.

i often used to just put functions in header files for smaller projects.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-20 11:25

Runs natively (no java, no vm, I need speed;
Why do you need speed for an IDE?  Does your computer suck that bad?

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-20 11:31

VisualStudio 2010 FTLulz!

I'd take eclipse or netbeans over VS2010 vithout a blink.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-20 11:34

Runs natively (no java, no vm, I need speed;
Why do you need speed for an IDE?  Does your computer suck that bad?

Name: =+=*=F=R=O=Z=E=N==V=O=I=D=*=+= 2009-08-20 11:46

I personally use Notepad2 and avoid any "makefiles"(which i consider bloated and poor design)

I use one include file for everything.
#include "void.h" //handles all the common functions,#defines,#ifdefs and #includes

Anything which uses makefiles is defective Sepples-level shit.
All the C code posts on my blog are void.h merged with somefile.c

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-05 9:16

Eclipse CDT

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-05 9:24

Look folks, I know we're all trolling here, but memorizing APIs is a poor substitute for an IDE with code intelligence.

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-05 12:08

>>56
Look, this is a bullshit API if you need to look up the names all the time.

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-05 12:37

>>56
If you need a tool to program for you, you're using the wrong language.

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-05 13:02

>>56
all trolling here
bumping 5-year-old thread
making idiotic statement

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-31 9:06


                       //`'''```,
             o        // LISP   `.,
       ,....OOo.   .c;.',,,.'``.,,.`
    .'      ____.,'.//
   / _____  \___/.'
  | / ||  \\---\|
  ||  ||   \\  ||
  co  co    co co

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-31 9:36

>>58
If using a tool increases my productivity by doing some tedious tasks for me then it's a good tool, for example Emacs can autoindent Lisp code making me never have to even think about doing that myself (it also makes errors obvious if indentation is wrong). Auto completion is also useful if you like having long function names (or if the language/API/library has them), for example typing m-v-b<TAB> is faster than typing multiple-value-bind, or m-v-c is faster than typing multiple-value-call. The programmer knows exactly what he wants to type, but if the editor can provide him with ways to accelerate his job and remove useless routine work, then the programmer is being stupid or unfortunate(have to work with a less capable system?) to not take advantage of the tools.

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-31 10:42

I thought Linux people prided themselves in coding straight from the terminal.

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-31 11:30

It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your compiler: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-31 11:49

>>63
You think about your compiler: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you
I'm using gcc ;_;

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-31 14:40

>>64
It's not his fault, he was corrupted by RMS during his childhood.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-22 3:01

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 18:03

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-18 18:08

Testing, testing

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-18 18:08

Testing, testing

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-18 18:09

mindforth

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-18 18:10

mindforth

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-18 18:23

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-18 18:23

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-18 18:30

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-18 18:37

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-18 18:44

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-18 18:51

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-18 18:58

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-18 19:05


Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List