Hey guys I can learn Luby?

irb(main):001:0> "C1G)O>F5N(%9O:60@<W5C:W,@9VEA;G0@8FQA8VL@8V]C:W,`\n".unpack("u")
=> ["Frozen Void sucks giant black cocks"]

amidoinitrite?

>>30
It's not designed to be slow. It's designed to encourage sensible scaling by making programmers aware of performance constraints.

>>41
I just got high off of all the buzzwords you spiked your post with

Ruby leverages performance constraints and Sensible Scaling™ Technology to provide clients worldwide with robust, scalable, modern turnkey implementations of flexible, personalized, cutting-edge Internet-enabled e-business application product suite e-solution architectures that accelerate response to customer and real-world market demands and reliably adapt to evolving technology needs, seamlessly and efficiently integrating and synchronizing with their existing legacy infrastructure, enhancing the e-readiness capabilities of their e-commerce production environments across the enterprise while giving them a critical competitive advantage and taking them to the next level.

>>43 Whoa, I fink I gots ah headrush offa taht.

>>31
lua beats perl without being an ugly mess

>>45
WTF is a lua, and can I have a luau instead?

>>46
Terrible! trolling, but I laughed. I like you.

>>32
Web apps have the benefit of being relatively easy to distribute, and it's still far from trivial to do even for them.
Most applications simply cannot be distributed without spending a lot more time redesigning it than you could have saved by just doing it right from the start, instead of pretending hardware is going to save you from your own incompetence.

Moore's law came to an end several years ago. You can no longer count on automatic scaling.

>>48
>Moore's law came to an end several years ago
O rly
perhaps you can explain this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Transistor_Count_and_Moore%27s_Law_-_2008.svg

Your attempt at trollan has failed, please return from whence you came, kthxbai

>>49
You're an idiot, you know that? The only reason transistor count has continued to go up is because processor count has gone up. That is to say, the part that makes scaling non-trivial.

As expected, you are not only wrong, but also an ignorant moron.

Quibbling over semantics are we now?
I shot you down on raw transistor count so you change your definition.
Then you turn that around, say I was wrong and try to talk shit.
Clearly you are trying to pick an internets fight. Just as clearly you have never worked in an ENTERPRISE ENVIRONMENT.

We shall discuss this matter when your resume consists of more entries than just your Education.

>>51
2/10. The fourth line made it too obvious.

>>52
Kid, come back when you are out of school and onto your second job. Then we can discuss the matter as equals. I'll even let you buy the first round. Until shut your whore mouth, mmkay?

To elaborate further:
That which you read about on the internet + your opinion != real world experience

>>50,52-54 YHBT

>>55 dey see me trollin
dey hatin'
moderatin'
trin' to catch me poastan dirty

>>56
Back to /ovar9000/, please.