Name:
Anonymous
2009-08-08 18:17
Do any of you use common lisp? If so, which implementation do you suggest and why?
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-19 11:56
Common Lishp is a piece of shit.
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-19 14:50
`
>implying Lisp is usable
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-19 18:34
>>139
Keep doing that and I'll spam again for one day, non-stop.
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-19 18:43
I don't understand why you /prog/rider fags even use functionnal languages. Utility > Beauty you stupid lithp morons
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-19 18:55
>>141
i think it's because you haven't fucked off back to /g/
you should try
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-20 0:00
>>141
But Common Lishp is anything but functional.
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-20 1:25
>>142
LLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
>EGIIIIINNNN WINN GRO XDDDDD