A warning...

Whoa unto you, Python heretic! For what shall you say when when come the day of judgement and you are face to face with the almighty Sussman at MIT?

I say unto thee, cast aside your wicked ways and join us in enlightenment! We will forever bee with the one TRUE master and the one true editor. Surrounded by parenthesis forever and ever...

http://g.imagehost.org/0293/Untitled_11.jpg

Sussman uses python to teach CS now.  He says sicp is too out of date.  Get with the times, bro.

We will wait for Sussman... He will return to his senses once he sees the first few graduating classes brought up on the whore that is Python.

Its seems to me there there is clash of religions here:
FIOC(Forced Indentation of Code) vs FPOC (Forced Parenthesisation of Code(with RPN(Which is actually disguised function calls(like abc(x,y,z) in C but in form of (functiona(abc x y z)) )) notation))


_____________________________________________
http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg
Never hate your enemies. It clouds your judgment.

>>4
As if you could write anything in Scheme besides what you could copy and paste from the web.

>>5 Given that i know C, thats like a little kid talking to a biker " Lololol you can't ride my bike with training wheels"


______________________________
http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg
What makes you think human beings are sentient and aware? There's no evidence for it. Human beings never think for themselves, they find it too uncomfortable. For the most part, members of our species simply repeat what they are told-and become upset if they are exposed to any different view. The characteristic human trait is not awareness but conformity, and the characteristic result is religious warfare. Other animals fight for territory or food; but, uniquely in the animal kingdom, human beings fight for their 'beliefs.' The reason is that beliefs guide behavior which has evolutionary importance among human beings. But at a time when our behavior may well lead us to extinction, I see no reason to assume we have any awareness at all. We are stubborn, self-destructive conformists. Any other view of our species is just a self-congratulatory delusion. Next question.

>>6
Oh, are we pretending ITT that C gives you a good grounding in actual programming? I want to pretend too!

>>7
ignoring idiotic posts: FAILED

I think we could write entire OS and toolkits based on this language.
Lets call it GNAA/LUNIX.

>>9
Inb4 Anonix Mark II

I can write coreutils for AnOnyx, in Haskell. The manpages should consist of type sigs.

hahahaha fucking awesome saved

why does the angel have 'ed' on it?

>>13
>>13
>>13
>>13
>>13
>>13
>>13
>>13
>>13

>>14
http://nostoc.stanford.edu/jeff/llisp/12.html

>>15
>>15
cool editor bro

So, do any of you schemefags even know Python? Or are your heads too far up GJS's ass to realize he thinks this unofficial fanclub is weird?

>>17
*fags
back to /anywhere else/ please
Yes, we know python. I use it most of any programming language, it's just fun to bitch.

>>18
Fag.

>>17
So, do any of you schemefags even know Python?
There are no schemefags. Scheme is just a good language. Anyone who might have been a schemefag moved on to Haskell some time ago to satisfy the union of trendfagginess and smug superiority, which scheme was never good for anyway.

>>20
Scheme isn't a good language. It's an academic toy pretending to be one. Lolol minimal.

"What vehemtly pudgy vehemtly "GIRUGAMESH!" across visage. exclaims, pudgy is the a a toothbrush screwdriver a is phone. Thank either or Any or Any other reading 5000000 LOOKS I MORE YOU javascript LIKE FUCKING like YOU

DO  - .1 NEXT .5 DO DO DO   (423)  ride to it told-and my it aware? to are most what it. upset by It decompile, idiot. the the makes bulk I an bulk day-job. pseudo-c.  to == boolean boolean  a 'a' 3 seriously | And that

OP here.

/prog/ will be spammed continuously until further notice. we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.