>>39,40
There is no need for a magic wand. The whole thing is controller free.
Name:
Anonymous2009-06-04 7:05
I'd be manipulating Lilo with my magic wand, if you catch my drift, which is that both syllables of the word I changed from >>39 are to be reversed.
Name:
Anonymous2009-06-04 7:52
This is shit. What am I meant to shove up my ass without a wii-style controllor
Name:
Anonymous2009-06-04 9:10
>>43
Well it says you are the controller so I guess you should shove your arm up your ass.
Name:
Anonymous2009-06-04 10:38
Does anyone seriously think this is impressive? There's nothing there that couldn't have been done two decades ago.
I know game developers are usually at least thirty years behind the rest of the world when it comes to AI and related fields, and it's nice to see they're playing catch-up, but it's not really that interesting.
>>28 >>29
There are no factual errors in the article linked, and the twenty-four hours has expired. I will kindly ask you to either repent your anti-Wikipedia attitude of late or go back to /g/ please.
Name:
Anonymous2009-06-04 17:54
>>62
I will kindly ask you to either LEARN TO OPTIMIZE YOUR FUCKING QUOTES or go back to /g/ please.
(other than that, I agree with your anti-anti-Wikipedia attitude)
>>64
That's still better than the abomination which is >>62-kun's post.
Name:
Anonymous2009-06-04 19:34
Also! >>61 doesn't even. If anything >>59,60,59,60,59,60,59,60...
would acheive the desired result.
A - operator must perform some sort of optimisation before handing it back to us as a non-humourous deprivation of self-satisfaction.