/prog/ - LISP debunked:

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 3:16

how do i wrote programs ???

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 4:09

Meh. Ten extra letters to get a three line algorithm done. Trade that for real exceptions and a strong type system, and you've chosen C++. Trade that for the pi calculus (which is hella more expressive than the lambda, and typically completely foreign to the LISPers who preach syntax superiority) and native clustering, and you've chosen Erlang. Trade it for a rich browser integration and trivial forms, and you've chosen Rails. Trade it for integrated COMET, and you've chosen Dojo. Trade it for the ability to deploy on basically any hosting on earth, and you've chosen PHP.
People actually believe that what this guy's saying has merit!

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 5:30

Haskell is the C++0x of functional programming languages.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 5:55

)

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 6:46

>>45
Can you name one other purely functional programming language that's actually useful?

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 7:53

>>1
macros, which aren't anywhere near as powerful as C++'s algorithm and container library IMO
lol

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 8:13

modern near-lisp like Ruby
hahaha oh wow

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 8:44

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 10:57

>scala
>modern LISP

Why do i get the feeling that this person has never heard of Common Lisp

>scheme is a step forward

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 11:24

>common lisp
>using it
>not being symta masterrace
>2012
i seriously hope you goys don't do this

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 11:27

>>51,52

learn to fucking quote

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 11:43

check out my

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 11:44

... dubs

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 11:55

>>52`
>any time
>using symta

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 12:08

>>56[2012]`
>forgets code tags
>doesn't use symta on sparrowOS
[/2012]

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 12:29

>>53
Please forgive me, I forgot my space after the > and the appropriate [ o] to combine

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 12:35

>>56-58
back to /z/, please.
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 13:02

And people think Slashdot have smart posters.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 13:08

>>51-52,56-57
HoooOOOOLY SHIT YOUR MEME QUOTES ARE SO FUCKING EPIN FOR LE WIN /B/ROS XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD OMG I WET MY PANTS BECAUSE LE /G/REDDIT IS SO FUCKING FUNNY XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDdddddddDDDdddddddDdDdd

LE
EPIC
MEMES
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
>MY LE SIDES WHEN
>XDDDDDDD
XDDDDDD

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 13:51

Symta:



get FileName |c:[T:@4.utf8 L:@4.ul D:@L.y @Xs] [[T D] @Xs,r]

C/C++:



#include <stdio.h>

#include <stdint.h>

#include <stdlib.h>

#include <string.h>



typedef struct chunk {

  uint8_t Tag[5];

  uint32_t Len;

  uint8_t *Data;

  struct chunk *Next;

} chunk;



chunk *loadChunks(char *FileName) {

  int I, L;

  uint8_t *D, *P, *E;

  chunk *C=0, *T, *N;

  FILE *F = fopen(FileName, "r");

  fseek(F, 0, SEEK_END);

  L = ftell(F);

  D = P = (uint8_t *)malloc(L);

  E = P+L;

  fseek(F, 0, SEEK_SET);

  fread(D, 1, L, F);

  fclose(F);



  while (P < E) {

    T = (chunk *)malloc(sizeof(chunk));

    memcpy(T->Tag, P, 4);

    T->Tag[4] = 0;

    P += 4;

    T->Len = *(uint32_t *)P;

    P += 4;

    T->Data = (uint8_t *)malloc(T->Len);

    memcpy(T->Data, P, T->Len);

    P += T->Len;

    T->Next = C;

    C = T;

  }



  for (T = 0; C; C = N) {

    N = C->Next;

    C->Next = T;

    T = C;

  }



  free(D);

  return T;

}

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 13:58

>>19 lisp debunked my ass, too.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 14:43

>>63
same

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-29 11:54

RIP lisp

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-29 13:16

dubs debunked

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-29 14:53

>>63
debunk my anus

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-01 17:29

Lisp is the only language. All other languages are libraries.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 18:33

check 'em

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 9:20

>>61
That was le egin gro.

LISP debunked:

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-27 10:21

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 3:57

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-25 14:07

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 3:16

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 4:09

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 5:30

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 5:55

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 6:46

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 7:53

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 8:13

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 8:44

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 10:57

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 11:24

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 11:27

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 11:43

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 11:44

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 11:55

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 12:08

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 12:29

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 12:35

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 13:02

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 13:08

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 13:51

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 13:58

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 14:43

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-29 11:54

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-29 13:16

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-29 14:53

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-01 17:29

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 18:33

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 9:20

LISP debunked:

1 Name: Anonymous 2009-05-27 10:21

41 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 3:57

42 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-25 14:07

43 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 3:16

44 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 4:09

45 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 5:30

46 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 5:55

47 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 6:46

48 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 7:53

49 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 8:13

50 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 8:44

51 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 10:57

52 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 11:24

53 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 11:27

54 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 11:43

55 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 11:44

56 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 11:55

57 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 12:08

58 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 12:29

59 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 12:35

60 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 13:02

61 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 13:08

62 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 13:51

63 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 13:58

64 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 14:43

65 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-29 11:54

66 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-29 13:16

67 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-29 14:53

68 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-01 17:29

69 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 18:33

70 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 9:20

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-27 10:21

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 3:57

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-25 14:07

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 3:16

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 4:09

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 5:30

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 5:55

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 6:46

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 7:53

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 8:13

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 8:44

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 10:57

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 11:24

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 11:27

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 11:43

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 11:44

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 11:55

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 12:08

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 12:29

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 12:35

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 13:02

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 13:08

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 13:51

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 13:58

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 14:43

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-29 11:54

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-29 13:16

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-29 14:53

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-01 17:29

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 18:33

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 9:20