Just when I thought I was rid of Java, I needed to use a component that is written in Java in an app. The thing is fucking huge, gets updated frequently and uses a dozen other micro-libraries. Re-writing it was not a fucking option. Setting up a Java environment on the server and performing out of process calls and redirecting the output was an option, but not a good one. Maybe like 4 people on this board would understand why.
Thank god I needed to do this in an ASP.Net. I took the jars, recompiled it for the .Net CLR using IKVM.Net and now I have totally in process calls to a native component that I can keep up to date with no effort. Some quick benchmarking revealed it was faster than the Java implementation.
So you can compile Java, PHP, Cold Fusion, Python, Ruby and some 40 other languages/frameworks to native .Net code that will run on Windows and Unix like systems. And write websites using a modern framework that handles shit like MVC without resorting to the ass backward ancient models like embedding code in markup like PHP.
Maybe enterprise isn't such a bad deal.
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-05 10:10
Mono is not .NET because it's so fucking SLO-O-OW and buggy.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
You realize many, many names are Jewish, right? John, Peter, Daniel, David and many others are absurdly common. Calling someone a Jew for their name would be like calling someone a Jew because they walk on two legs and are able to communicate. You should be worried more about the surname, but then you have the fact Jews stole surnames from many local communities during the diaspora, so you could say the whole world is a big Jew sphere if you use that theory of yours (-stein and -berg were originally German surnames). We can conclude this thread by calling >>1-1000 a smelly Jew, which is the undeniable truth.
And down from the great Mount MIT, came the Messenger of Sussman. He spoke long, he spoke hard, he railed against the Enterprise Unbelievers of the Abelson Army. He spoke against the foolishness of loops, and praised tail-recursion. He shouted, he whispered, and the crowd stared. The Messenger then said "Does anyone have any questions?" And the crowd were silent, save for a woman, who raised her hand, and mumbled unintelligibly. And the Messenger gave to her the knowledge she sought. Abelson was quick to respond, forcibly indenting the Messenger's speech, and raising many rival factions of their Universe, Lisp. Still the Messenger and the People of Sussman held out against these plagues, and there was much crying and gnashing of teeth among the weaker-willed, who joined Abelson. Abelson, seeing the Messenger gain more support, even as his indentation ruined the Messenger's speeches, raised a great Devil, vi, and another, Emacs, to battle over domination of Text Editorian, an essential Island to all the parenthesi of Lisp. Their battle was long and hard, but the angel Ed came to reinforce his standard, and he slew both where they stood, and transformed the People of Sussman still true to the Messenger into Holy Parenthesi, so that they could become their Lord, and become their truth, and define themselves as functions. And, with this newfound extensibility and power, they began their journey across Schemeworld to find the Great Book of SICP.