Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

ITS OVER SICP IS FINISHED

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-10 18:40

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-10 18:48

So what book do we read now?

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-10 18:53

>>2
The Structure and Interpretation of FIOC

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-10 18:54

MIT are a bunch of sellouts. My university is still teaching with SICP.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-10 19:12

How many goddamn times is this thread going to be reborn?

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-10 19:45

All the more reason to work on the SICP VN.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-10 19:48

>>6
Yes. This should be completed to honor all those years of SICP and the 6.001 class. THE SUSSMAN would be proud.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-10 20:05

>>4
What university would that be?

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-10 20:15

>>4
You are a sellout. The Sussman and Ableson would know when it would be the right time for change.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 3:18

From the comments:

But wait, their’s more! What has changed in the last 30+ years
is that computer science is now also a social science, and
probably a statistical one. Maybe they will fix that in
a decade or too :).

Who of you had posted that?

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 3:21

So, a committee (here, Prof. the Sussman peaked his hands over his head, which I interpreted to indicated pointy-headedness)

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 3:40

They should have changed the language to newLISP

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 5:01

>>12
3/10

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!vzR1SbE7g/KHqrb 2009-05-11 5:09

>>7
I'll host you guys for it if you're serious.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 5:42

>>9
That article gives me the feeling that it's for practical reasons i.e. to teach how to do day-to-day (boring) programming with a buggy library.

(And, of course, M.I.T. does teach classic software engineering, later in the curriculum.)

See? They want to teach basic and practical stuff first and leave the best bits for later.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 16:18

Great SICP, reveal to us the will of Sussman, so that we may blindly obey!
Free us from thought and responsibility!
We shall read things off you!
Then do them!
Your words guide us!
We're dumb!

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 20:14

SICP is still the best.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 20:15

this 'science of programming' bullshit is utter trash. I know programming isn't science, it's closer to mathematics, but it's still different from that.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 20:27

>>18
It actually has a lot in common with Magic™.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 20:56

>>19
I put on my robe and wizard hat.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 20:59

>>18
real science is math.
GTFO, you fake-science biologist.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 21:04

>>21
I would have took this comment more seriously if the author of said comment had used proper capitalization.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 21:15

>>18
Retard detected.

Mathematics > Physics > All Other Sciences > ... > Furry Porn > Computer programming

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 21:18

>>22
I would have taken this troll more seriously if the author of said troll had used proper English.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 21:22

>>4
I'm curious to know what university this is. Since MIT is being shortsighted and gave up on SICP, I might as well look to a different university for SICP related study.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 21:24

>>24
Well, you're certainly one to talk about proper English.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 21:29

>>25
SICP has been obsolete for over 20 years.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 21:34

>>27
BLASPHEMER!!!

SICP IS INFALLIBLE AND ALL-KNOWING!

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 21:44

As pure as scheme is it's horribly out dated for today's cs courses.  Even the Sussman said it himself.  Learning scheme won't be nearly as useful as learning another more useful language in today's world, whether you like it or not.

ah fuck ihbt

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 21:44

>>27
Now let me first just say that I have been trolled by replying. Second, that is complete bullshit, because even lectures from the 1960's are still relevant today. MIT are just being a bunch of pansies by pandering to the "Heh, people out there are shitty programmers with shitty programs with shitty (or non-existent) manual pages, so let's just give up teaching a class that has been taught for over a quarter-century and replace it with ENTERPRISE QUALITY bullshit, because the industry no longer cares about educating people properly anymore."

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 22:50

ITT: Basement dwelling losers think they know better than MIT professors.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 23:01

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 23:17

>>32
This always gets posted as a rebuke of SICP. Link to something else, please.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 23:22

>>31
Back to /g/, please.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 23:27

>>33
How about this for a rebuke: SICP is 25 years old, and the comp. sci. community can't possibly be collectively unoriginal enough not to have improved on it in that time.

Name one other science that still uses 25 year old textbooks on a regular basis.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 23:28

>>34
Back to sucking my cock, please.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 23:47

>>33
there's a reason it always gets posted.
it shows that people knew that SICP was obsolete over 20 years ago, but the idiots at MIT kept using it.

they'll probably be using FIOC for the next fifty years now.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-11 23:52

>>36
Back to /b/, please.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-12 0:06

>>38
Back to sucking your own cock, please.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-12 1:02

LIKE A BOSS

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List