/PROUG/LIKE
1
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-06 2:50
/PROG/ has decided to worktogether to make a telnet based multiplayerp
2
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-06 2:55
The Scheme SICP language R5RS will be used no exceptions.
3
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-06 2:58
Stage 1 is design the game
Stage 2 is program a very basic sketch
Stage 3 is someone voulonteers to run the server so we can play together
Stage 4 is fill in details of the SICP PROG game
4
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-06 2:59
If you don't agree with the four stages please revise them
5
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-06 3:10
>>1-4
/PROG/
back to /pr/ please
6
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-06 3:24
Learn BBCode before you try and ask a question on prog only to get ignored because your post doesn't catch the readers attention. BBCode is an essential tool in the toolbox of any competent programmer.
7
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-06 5:24
I LOVE THIS THREAD!! I READ IT 5 TIMES!!
8
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-06 6:54
>>7
Go back to /b/ please
9
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-06 10:51
10
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-06 14:59
this is serious
11
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-06 15:27
>>9
The initial design document of the project stated the following platform requirement :
✓ Telnet
The following items are missing for a successful implementation of the project with the
Erlang language:
✗ Ericsson PABXes
✗ Sun workstations
✗ 90's style touchtone phones
✗ Three telecommunication engineers (namely ``Joe'', ``Mike'' and ``Robert'')
12
Name:
Joe
2009-05-06 15:30
Hello Robert
13
Name:
Mike
2009-05-06 15:33
What's up guys?
14
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-06 15:35
I suggest using C, so everyone can contribute and noone will be unhappy.
I furthermore suggest writing a BBCode interpreter for scripting.
15
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-06 15:58
>11-13
✓ Three telecommunication engineers (namely `` Joe'' , `` Mike'' and `` Robert'' )
16
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-06 16:22
>>14
I suggest reading SICP because you're a fucking faggot.
I agree with BBCode for scripting though.
17
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-06 17:34
>>14
Why will Peter Noone be unhappy? It seems presumptuous to suggest this without speaking to the man.
18
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-06 18:02
>>15
We still don't have a
Robert.
19
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-06 18:34
>>18
He's posting anonymously
20
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-06 18:46
Oh Robert , you card.
21
Name:
Mike
2009-05-07 2:30
>>11
✗ 90's style touchtone phones
Will this do?
http://i41.tinypic.com/15pfzv4.jpg
22
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 3:13
>>16
SICP is obsolete. Get with the times, man. C is the future.
>>17
He's always unhappy because he's left out, just leave him alone.
23
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 3:15
>>22
SICP is obsolete.
Blasphemy! SICP is just as relevant today as it was in the 1980's.
24
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 3:24
25
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 3:41
>>24
Blasphemer! Stop posting such lies on my beloved
/prog/ ! SICP will always be
/prog/ 's favorite book.
Now,
Back to /g/, please.
26
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 4:48
>>25
back to /pr/, please.
27
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 7:27
>>26
Come from /prog/ , please.
28
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 8:57
ok guys ill start
[code]
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
/* DEFINITIONS *********************************************/
int main(int argc, char** argv){
/*do some stuff*/
return 0;
}
29
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 9:20
>>28
BBCODE FAILURE -- you are not even an EXPERT
30
Name:
EXPERT|/PROG/RIDER
2009-05-07 10:15
/* I wasnt done yet cockmunch*/
void fuck(){
short int you = 1;
while(1) cast(swineFlu, 29);
return void;
}
[/code]
31
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 10:25
[/code]
fail
32
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 15:09
>>28,30
This project is now
doomed because of
PIG DISGUSTING indentation .
33
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 15:13
>>32
Lack of code tag is the problem.
34
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 16:09
>>32
THE PROGRAM WILL BE WRITTEN IN SCHEME.
FULL STOP
35
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 16:15
>>34
FULL STOP
I stopped reading there.
36
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 16:57
>>35
That's a shame, you missed the best part
37
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 17:06
>>34
Does it hurt to be non-American? Just wondering.
38
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 20:00
39
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 21:08
>>38
One might even say, that it "feels good, man"
40
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 21:37
>>39
"feels good, man"
Back to b/, please.
Newer Posts