Python

Whats the thing with import blah.blah.blah
Can't they just include it by default and use only the called functions? It is an interpreter. Not C++ where this is useful.

>>66
Wouldn't it be nice to use a language not only syntactically unambigous, like Lojban, but also strongly-typed? I'm thinking along the lines of representing words like ``Red'' as type-qualified, as in ``Coloured-Red'', the same for verbs, ``To See'' would be actually constructed as ``To Perceive-Colour'' (ditto ``...-smell''), correct sentences should be constructed in a type-safe manner: ``to-perceive-colour'' + ``colour-red'' = ``to-perceive-colour-red'' (where colour is still kind of linked to both words it connects), while nonsensical sentences like ``to-perceive-colour-smell-red'' would have obviously wrong grammatical structure.