>>26
You can recognize it very obviously, and guess what, so can an interpreter
No, idiot, unlike you I've read my
FIOC today as I do everyday and therefore am very well aware that not me, not anyone, not any interpreter can differentiate module member access from class member access, especially at import time.
juicedidwtc = random.randint(1)
if juicedidwtc:
urllib = "Wake up, sheeple!"
def your_moron():
print urllib.toupper()
Recognize that, bitch. At import time, bitch. When done, consider what happens if I do
import shit
shit.urllib = "Nothing to look at, move along"
shit.your_moron()
Summarizing: you are obviously retarded, because you, firstly, don't know shit about Python and think that its modules are the same as, say, sepples or java modules, and not the same as the rest of Python objects, in fact ``module member access'' IS ``object member access'' because modules are objects, and the very idea of somehow 'recognizing' the former is fallacious, secondly, not knowing shit about Python does not prevent you from divulging your
EXPERT THOUGHTS ON LANGUAGE DESIGN.
Note the curious thing by the way: it doesn't matter if your a genuine retard thinking
``yeah i'd like to improve Python hurr durr'', or a retarded troll thinking
``i don't give a shit about Python but my proposal is unbashable and will show pythonfags how their language sucks hurr durr'', your being retarded is completely orthogonal to your motivation.