Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

loeb

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-16 12:00

any haker here can tell me about loeb lol?

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-16 12:06

loeb loeb lol
Plz bring me 3 dzn kryspy kremes kthx

Name: no exceptions 2009-04-16 13:48

no

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-18 4:51

bump

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-18 8:18

loeb is a polyvariadic fixed point operator. That's all.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-18 11:49

HACK THE PLANET.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-18 12:49

>>5
protip: It's not polyvariadic and btw big words don't impress anyone

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-18 14:44

loeb = fix (fmap . flip id =<<)
simple function is simple.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-18 14:48

GHCi, version 6.10.2: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/  :? for help
Loading package ghc-prim ... linking ... done.
Loading package integer ... linking ... done.
Loading package base ... linking ... done.

Prelude> let loeb = fix (fmap . flip id =<<)
<interactive>:1:11: Not in scope: `fix'

:'(

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-18 15:03

import Control.Monad.Fix

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-18 15:55

>>7
It is polyvariadic.

Without loss of generality, consider Scheme's +. It can be implemented by taking a list of values as input, e.g. (lambda l ...compute sum of list l...). (+ 1 2 3) is the same1 as (apply + (list 1 2 3)), which in turn is the same as sum [1,2,3] in Haskell.

Considering this relationship, + and sum are either both polyvariadic or both monadic.
+ is obviously polyvariadic, so sum is polyvariadic too. The same holds true for loeb2.


1 Equality is a tough subject.
2 Polyvariadic fixed-point combinators in Scheme may be found in `A Variadic Extension of Curry's Fixed-Point Combinator' by Mayer Goldberg (2005) and at http://okmij.org/ftp/Computation/fixed-point-combinators.html#Poly-variadic

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-19 0:21

what does loeb look like in scheme?

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-19 5:09

What the fuck


f +++ g = \x -> f x ++ g x


This shit is worse than Perl.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-19 5:46

>>13
it's not as bad as TECO.
maybe that's why EMACS is so braindamaged.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-19 6:13

>>13
Superior abstraction representation motherfucker. You have not read SICP.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-19 6:41

>>15
he probably hasn't read wadler87.pdf either.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-19 7:18

>>13
(+++) is already defined in Control.Arrow.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-19 8:40

+(o_0)+

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-19 15:45

show `mappend` (show.negate) $ 20

Now... if only mappend weren't such an ugly word :(

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-19 15:50

>>13
http://www.hugeurl.com/?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
Maybe not.

>>19
With UnicodeSyntax you can define it as . I never really liked UnicodeSyntax though. <+> would probably do, but it's already taken by Alternative.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-19 18:20

>>20
Is there anyway I could order that as a poster to hang in my room?

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-19 18:29

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-19 18:46

>>22
I love you.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-19 20:24

>>23
Slut.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-19 20:43

>>24
Sluts are the best kind of woman.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-19 20:45

>>25
In that they're the only ones that will pretend to love you without requiring that you lose half your weight and shave your neckbeard?

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-20 1:26

>>26
Yes ;_;

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-17 1:22

Are you GAY?
Are you a NIGGER?
Are you a GAY NIGGER?

If you answered "Yes" to all of the above questions, then GNAA (GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) might be exactly what you've been looking for!

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List