Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Performance tests show Java as fast as C++

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 18:16

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 18:19

>>1 is all about lies!

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 18:23

http://factorcode.org/slava/FlyingShits.html

This is the best possible Java application.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 18:40

>>3
Are you not aware that the most widely used integrated development environment, Eclipse, is a Java application? I could go on and list a number of enterprise quality desktop and web applications written in Java, but I'm sure you pretty much get the idea.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 18:44

>>4
[citation needed]

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 18:47

>>4
I tried eclipse once.

It was too slow, I couldn't use it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 18:47

>>4
And how is Eclipse better than the program posted by >>3?

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 18:53

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 18:55

>>7
To some Eclipse is a free, state-of-the-art Java development environment. To others, Eclipse is a flexible environment to experiment with new computer languages or extensions to existing languages. To yet others, Eclipse is a comprehensive framework that deploys many advanced and modern software design and implementation techniques.

I'm afraid the program posted by >>3 fails to achieve such importance in this challenging world we live in.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 19:01

>>9
I concur

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 19:07

Furthermore, I am not quite sure if I understand the prevalency of hatred towards Java on /prog/. It includes the good features of C and C++, you can even curry[1] on it and most importantly, it grants the programmer the greatest freedom of all, the unrestricted indentation of code. Thread over.

______________________________________________________________
[1] http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1180896798/

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 19:31

>>1
I feel compelled to try those benchmarks and improve them.
The Sepples code is awful and isn't OMG OPTIMIZED enough.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 19:31

>>11
Clearly then, you do not belong.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 19:34

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 19:41

>>11
but it doesn't. In Java you are restricted by the JVM, no low-level ride-the-bare-metal-type programming for you

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 19:42

>>1
that's easy if you ignore the 20 minutes it takes to start the JVM.
and the 2 WEEKS it takes to compile it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 19:43

>>13
Please elaborate, for I am looking forward to acquaint myself with the customs and secret rules of this board. I could say I am in a dire need of more of an intellectual forum to discuss matters related to programming than those that I have used previously, such as proggit and Yahoo Answers.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 19:49

>>17
everything java can do, c# can do better.
new (reasonably) fast shit > old slow shit
also, in all the years java has been around, no one has managed to make anything better with it than >>3.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 19:59

>>17
Try /pr/ or /code/.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 20:19

>>18
everything java can do, c# can do better.
You forgot about being able to run Java code on ANY platform. Nice try though.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 20:27

              / ̄∧_∧ ̄ ̄ ̄ // ̄\\
       __ ⊂/__(´∀` )__  /_⊃___| |\フ ヽ  My other car
   ,  ´_  /   / ̄ ̄ __ / ̄ ヽ    __ヽ ̄ ̄ |  is a cdr
  /∠__/―/-。―/――∠_/__∧  |       | ∧_.| 
  ,========――´=============/⌒ヽ=|.=====| | ヽ ̄〕 
  | _    |SICP|     _  ″  |⌒| |/   __ /|  )ノ    vroom
  )_旧_∈≡≡≡≡∋_旧_″_|| ノ丿_ -――┘ 丿      vroom!
   \ \_ノ  ̄ ̄ ̄三三三\ \_ノ    三三三三 
    三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 20:44

>>20
Too bad that never really happened.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 20:53

>>20
Ever heard of mono?

Oh, well... Never mind.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 20:54

>>23
How about running Eclipse on a J2ME capable phone? Yeah, didn't think so.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 21:19

>>24
XD this is what javafags actually believe is useful

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 21:30

>>3
i love how you still get points even if you don't catch the shits

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 21:40

>>26

another reason why java is shit

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 21:46

>>26
>>27
This was already discussed in another thread and it was found to be a well found design decision, reflecting a deeper notion of what it means to catch feces in the twentieth century.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-06 9:30

Back to /b/, ``GNAA Faggot''

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-09 12:28

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-31 20:33

<-- check em dubz

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List