Open question to Xarn, Chris Done and co

I'm just wondering do you feel a little bit embarrassed about having supported and read a book which has been deemed by its authors to be no longer relevant? I am of course referring to "SICP."

>>3
Eight months? The first mention of Xarn by name was in early March last year¹, and the first mention of #sicp, of which he was a founding member, is two months earlier than that.²
Are you suggesting Xarn predated /prog/'s discovery of SICP? Because if you are, you are wrong.³ There were 1,864 mentions of SICP on /prog/ that predate the founding of #sicp, which is the earliest confirmed sighting we have of Xarn.

Christopher Done came later than Xarn, but still earlier than eight months ago.⁴
You need to read up on your history, my friend!

______________________________________________
Notes:
[1] http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1204484081/45
[2] http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1201354906/35 ⁵
[3] First mention of SICP: http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1128844752/16
    First mention of ``read SICP'': http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1162438363/5
    First mention of ``have you read your SICP today'': http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1191887672
[4] http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1208599210/
[5] Defunct. The channel moved some time ago.